A large gas injection program in this unitized field in California has improved gravity drainage, resulting in an ultimate recovery approaching half the oil in place. Deliberate water production has reduced a natural water influx that would have reduced recovery if not checked. Few "giant" oil fields can match the performance of the Coalinga Nose field. Introduction The Gatchell pool of the Coalinga Nose field provides a 34-year case history of a gravity drainage reservoir. The field is approximately 6 miles northeast of the town of Coalinga in Fresno County, Calif. After 12 years of competitive operations, the field was unitized in 1950. The most unusual feature of the Gatchell pool's production history is that since unitization, it pool's production history is that since unitization, it has been operated in a manner to maximize the gravity drainage potential and arrest natural water encroachment. Crestal gas injection was begun in 1950 and has continued to the present. A pilot waterflood was attempted but was short lived because it proved less efficient than gravity drainage. Further, large volumes of water have been produced from edge wells to prevent natural water encroachment from reducing recovery. In 1969, the gas injection was supplemented with a large-scale program of nonindigenous-gas injection. More than 58 Bcf of natural gas has been injected under this program. Cumulative oil production exceeds 425 million bbl, or 42.7 percent of the production exceeds 425 million bbl, or 42.7 percent of the original oil in place, and the current production is about 10,000 BOPD. An ultimate recovery of 470 million bbl, or 47.2 percent of the oil in place, is expected; this is an increase of 79 million bbl over the calculated primary recovery. Development History and Method Of Operation The pool was discovered with the completion of well Gatchell No. 2 (now 1-18F) on June 26, 1938. Development progressed rapidly until Dec. 1941, at which time 157 wells had been drilled. Most of the field was developed on 20-acre spacing, but some closer spacing along the east flank and the southwest area has reduced the average spacing. A total of 192 wells had been completed as of July 1, 1972. In June of that yea, 75 of those wells were active producers, 21 were used for gas injection, 15 had been abandoned, and 81 were idle. During World War II the maximum efficient production rate (MER) for the pool was set by the production rate (MER) for the pool was set by the Petroleum Administration for War (PAW). Petroleum Administration for War (PAW). Controversy between the PAW and the operators developed over what the proper production rate should be to minimize pressure decline. MER's set during this period ranged from 15,000 to 50,000 B/D. To meet period ranged from 15,000 to 50,000 B/D. To meet the wartime demand, production in excess of the MER was permitted to as high as 59,000 bbl. The MER was 30,000 B/D when the PAW was dissolved on Sept. 30, 1945. MER recommendations were made by the Conservation Committee of California Oil Producers as the successor of the PAW. From 1945 until 1953 the operators produced at rates ranging from 43,000 to 54,000 B/D. The production history for the pool is shown graphically in Fig. 1. JPT P. 1147
This paper was prepared for the 41st Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, to be held in Dallas, Tex., Oct. 2–5, 1966. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented. Publication elsewhere after publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor of the appropriate journal provided agreement to give proper credit is made. Discussion of this paper is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society of Petroleum Engineers office. Such discussion may be presented at the above meeting and, with the paper, may be considered for publication in one of the two SPE magazines. Abstract The Orcutt field, Santa Barbara County, California, was discovered in 1902. The Third Zone waterflood began in 1950 with a one well pilot test. The present Third Zone waterflood was initiated in 1963. The development of the project from the pilot to its current status is reviewed. The response attributable to pilot, peripheral and pattern injection is discussed along with operating principles which are followed. It is concluded that the change from a peripheral injection plan to pattern injection has been beneficial because of the reduced project life and improved well performance. Introduction The Orcutt field is located approximately 175 miles northwest of Los Angeles, California, (Fig. 1) and 8 miles south of Santa Maria in Santa Barbara County. Careaga 10, the discovery well, was drilled in 1902 by the Western Union Oil Company (Shell Oil). Union Oil Company's first well in the Orcutt field, Hartnell 1, was completed that same year. This well, together with the discovery of the Lompoc field, nine miles south of the Orcutt area, was of particular significance as they were the forerunners to other fields that Union would produce in the Central California Coastal area. There are three productive horizons underlying the Orcutt field. These are designated as the First, Second and Third Zones. This report is concerned with water injection into the Third Zone. The present areal extent of the project is outlined in Fig. 2. RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS Structure The productive portion of the Orcutt Third Zone reservoir lies within a faulted anticlinal dome. Contours on top of the Third Zone, Fig. 3, show the attitude of the structure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.