No abstract

Combination treatment of TACE and sorafenib in the present trial was tolerable and associated with an interesting response rate, TTP and OS. Combination therapies will probably close gaps in the present mono therapy driven treatment guidelines for locally advanced HCC.

No abstract

No abstract

In numerous tumors, metastasis can be limited to the liver. In non-resectable patients, regional treatment modalities, especially arterial cytostatic infusion, are favored in contrast to systemic chemotherapy, whereas intraportal or intraperitoneal application is not successful. Improved results with high response rates have been reported after development of intra-arterial (i.a.) long-term regimens with FUdR in patients with colorectal liver metastases using implantable pumps and ports. However, a survival benefit could only be demonstrated in comparison with a control group only treated symptomatically. Because of several reports on major local toxicity of i.a. FUdR treatment (i.e. chemical hepatitis and biliary sclerosis) several other effective i.a. 5-FU regimens have been developed. A randomized study has demonstrated superiority of i.a. 5-FU versus i.a. FUdR. In comparison with systemic treatment, superiority has only been demonstrated in patients with an intrahepatic tumor burden of < 25%. Publications about regional treatment of patients with breast, gastric cancer or carcinoid liver metastases are rare. Despite the high response rates reported, the benefit of arterial chemotherapy remains questionable. Overall, local long-term chemotherapy cannot be recommended outside of studies as a primary treatment. However, extensive experience and new drugs support the idea of conducting further regional studies.

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable liver metastases induced significant remissions without increasing morbidity. The rate of severe complications and cases of no R0-resection in this study was 31 % and was with that significantly lower than 50 % (95 % CI 17.6 %-47.1 %). The risk to the patient is therefore acceptable when undergoing neoadjuvant treatment in a prospective intergroup trial.

No abstract

Purpose: Malignant ascites is debilitating for patients with advanced cancer. As shown previously, tumour cell production of vascular endothelial growth factor might be a major cause of the formation of malignant ascites. Intraperitoneal bevacizumab could therefore be an option for symptom control in refractory ascites. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and malignant ascites who had undergone paracentesis at least twice within the past 4 weeks were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to intraperitoneal bevacizumab (400 mg absolute) or placebo after paracentesis. During the 8-week treatment period, a minimum interval of 14 d was kept between the applications of the study drug. Primary end-point was paracentesis-free survival (ParFS). Results: Fifty-three patients (median age 63 years) were randomised. Forty-nine patients received at least one study drug application and qualified for the main analysis. The