Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objectives. To analyze the outcomes at skeletal maturity of patients treated with a single traditional growing rod (GR). To compare results of patients according to whether posterior spinal fusion (PSF) was performed at treatment completion. Summary of Background Data. Few studies examined the end results of GRs at skeletal maturity. There is no agreement on requirement of PSF at GR treatment completion. Methods. Clinical and radiological analysis of consecutive patients with severe and/or progressive scoliosis treated initially with traditional single GR. Group comparisons of patients with PSF and without fusion surgery at treatment completion. Results. Thirty-four patients underwent traditional single GR implantation at a median age of 11.7 years. Median follow-up was 6.5 years. At last follow-up, T1-S1 distance was increased by a median 116 mm (P < 0.001) and median major curve Cobb angle was changed from 55° preoperatively to 30° (P < 0.001). Complications included 26 rod fractures, 1 implant prominence, 4 proximal junctional kyphosis, 2 proximal hook dislodgments, and 2 wound infections. At the beginning our experience, PSF was performed systematically in 17 patients. Relying on spinal ankylosis, 17 patients were subsequently not fused at GR treatment completion (single GR removed N = 2, single GR retained N = 7, dual GR surgery N = 8). There were no statistical differences between groups in improvements of radiological parameters from preoperative GR insertion to last follow-up. No GR fracture occurred after dual GR surgery. Conclusion. Single GR allows curve control and promotes spinal growth. Dual GR is, however, recommended for rod fracture prevention and better correction maintenance. In patients with satisfactory deformity correction at skeletal maturity, one may consider retaining dual GR instead of performing PSF. Level of Evidence: 4
An achondroplastic patient with a thoracolumbar kyphosis was first seen at the age of 16 at our institution. His only concern at that time was the aesthetic implication of his deformity. His physical examination was normal except for loss of the neurologic reflexes in the lower limbs. The radiographs showed a fixed 180°thoracolumbar kyphosis with correct frontal and sagittal balances. No spinal cord anomaly was found on MRI. Two years later, he developed a progressive neurogenic claudication of the lower limbs.He was still neurologically intact at rest. The MRI showed an abnormal central spinal cord signal in front of the apex of the kyphosis associated with the narrow congenital spinal canal. In regards to this progressive neurological worsening, a surgical treatment was decided. We decided to perform a front and back arthrodesis combined with a spinal cord decompression without reduction of the deformity. A five-level hemilaminotomy was performed with a posterior approach at the kyphosis deformity. The spinal cord was individualised onto 10 cm and the left nerve roots were isolated. A decancellation osteotomy of the three apex vertebrae and a disc excision were performed. The posterior aspect of the vertebral body was then translated forward 2 cm and in association with the spinal cord. Two nerve roots were severed laterally to approach the anterior part of the kyphosis and a peroneal strut graft was inlayed anterolaterally. A complementary anterior and a right posterolateral fusion was made with cancellous bone. The patient was immobilised in a cast for 3 months relayed by a thoracolumbosacral orthosis for 6 months. At 3 years follow-up, the neurogenic claudication had disappeared. No worsening of the kyphosis was observed. His only complaint is violent electric shock in the lower limbs with any external sudden pressure on the spinal cord in the area uncovered by bone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.