No abstract

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) has been utilized primarily in the palliative and definitive treatment of bulky tumors. Delivered in the modern era primarily with megavoltage photon therapy, this technique offers the promise of safe dose escalation with potential immunogenic, bystander and microvasculature effects that can augment a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. At the University of Maryland, an institutional standard has arisen to incorporate a single fraction of GRID radiation in large (.8 cm), high-risk soft tissue and osteosarcomas prior to a standard fractionated course. Herein, we report on the excellent pathologic responses and apparent safety of this regimen in 26 consecutive patients.

No abstract

For patients with lung cancer worldwide, it is feasible to obtain PROs and to create SCPs through an Internet-based program. As patients with lung cancer achieve improved survival, further attention should be paid to PROs. Surprisingly, neurocognitive symptoms seem to be the most common issues and therefore the most important to address. Increased effort should be made to provide SCPs, particularly in urban and university cancer center settings.

CTC monitoring after SBRT for presumed early stage NSCLC may give lead-time notice of disease recurrence or progression. Conversely, negative CTC counts after treatment may provide reassurance of disease control. CTC analysis is thus potentially useful in enhancing clinical diagnosis and follow-up in this population.

No abstract

Introduction: Re-irradiation (re-RT) for locoregionally recurrent esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer and de novo esophageal þ GEJ cancer arising in-field after a course of prior radiation poses considerable treatment challenges given the sensitivity of surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Guidelines for treatment of this presentation are not well established. Pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy has the ability to decrease radiation dose to OARs relative to photon plans. We present the first published series to date of re-RT with PBS for esophageal þ GEJ malignancies and hypothesize that re-RT with proton PBS will be feasible and improve the safety profile of re-RT for this cohort of patients.Methods: Consecutive esophageal þ GEJ cancers treated with PBS re-RT within a single institution were analyzed. Comparative volumetric-modulated arc therapy photon plans were generated. A total of 17 patients were included for analysis.Results: At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, 1-year local control was 75.3% and overall survival was 68.9%. There were five (27.8%) grade 3 or higher late toxicities. When matched for clinical target volume coverage, proton PBS plans delivered significantly lower doses to the spinal cord, lungs, liver, and heart (all p < 0.05); five volumetricmodulated arc therapy plans would have been undeliverable on the basis of physician-specified OAR constraints.Conclusions: Re-RT for de novo or recurrent malignancies of the esophagus þ GEJ, when delivered with PBS proton therapy, yields high rates of local control with acceptable acute and late toxicities in a high-risk population and decreased radiation dose to OARs relative to comparative photon plans. This is the largest series of proton re-RT for esophageal malignancies and the first that exclusively used PBS.

We aimed to assess perceptions of, and training regarding, the publishing process among US radiation oncology (RO) residents, focusing on awareness and understanding of criteria for selecting appropriate and legitimate peer-reviewed journals for academic publishing. The growing challenge of predatory publication in the broader scientific realm and its relevancy to resident training is also briefly discussed. Methods and Materials: A survey was opened to residents of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educationeaccredited RO programs in the United States, focusing on 3 categories: (1) demographics; (2) submission, peer review, and publication of academic research; and (3) subjective ranking of factors for choosing an appropriate publisher/journal. Results were stratified by level of training and number of publications. Results: Overall, 150 of 690 residents (19.8%) responded, with a 98% (147 of 150) completion rate. Twenty of 150 residents (13.3%) reported formal training in manuscript preparation and choosing academic journals. Only 3.4% of residents reported departmental guidelines regarding publication in "predatory" journals; 57.7% were unsure. The 3 most important factors influencing publisher and journal choice were impact factor (ranked first for 59.0%), whether a journal is found in a major index (ranked first for 18.0%), and association with a reputable organization (ranked first for 17.0%). Importance of impact factor increased with number of publications (50% with 0 publications, 48.3% with 1-5, 63.9% with 5-10, 76.2% with 10-15, and 70.6% with >15). Cost considerations influenced journal choice at least once for 79 (52.7%) residents. Conclusions: Impact factor was the most important consideration for residents when choosing an appropriate publisher, with increased emphasis with increasing number of publications. A minority had formal training in choosing appropriate academic journals and knowing how to identify so-called predatory journals or were aware if their department has proscriptions regarding publication in such journals. Additional emphasis on formal training for RO residents in manuscript preparation and choosing academic journals is warranted.