No abstract

Background: Octocrylene is a new emerging photoallergen. We report and discuss 50 cases of photoallergic contact dermatitis from octocrylene use and/or positive photopatch test reactions to this UV filter and draw attention to the unexpected association in adults with a history of photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen.Observations: Patients were divided in 3 groups: group A comprised 11 children; group B, 28 adults with a history of photoallergy from sunscreen products; and group C, 14 adults systematically tested with octocrylene because of a history of photoallergy from ketoprofen. All patients but 3 in group C had positive test reactions to octocrylene. Ten of 11 children in group A and 9 of 28 adults in group B had positive patch test reactions to octocrylene. One child in group A, the other 19 adults in group B, and 11 of 14 adults in group C had positive pho-

Figure 2 Chilblain: Source of chilblain posts (a), Post on Facebook (b), Chilblain observed by teledermatology (c) and Chilblain (d).

In around 50% of melanomas, the BRAF V600 mutation, resulting in an activation of the MAP kinase pathway, is detected. BRAF inhibitors have shown remarkable activity on the disease. However, efficacy is short-lived in most cases, with a median disease-free survival of 6 months. This short duration of response could be explained by the acquisition of resistance mechanisms. Some cancers show sensitivity to the reintroduction of previously active drugs after disease progression. We carried out a retrospective monocentric study on patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma who were rechallenged with BRAF inhibitors that were previously beneficial, but in whom the disease had progressed. Nine patients were included. Five patients showed a subsequent partial response, two showed a dissociated response leading to clinical improvement, and two showed no radiological nor clinical response. Eight patients who received rechallenge BRAF inhibitor had received an intercurrent treatment with ipilimumab. These cases suggest that intermittent treatment with BRAF inhibitors could provide clinical benefit and that sequential therapies should be further evaluated in clinical trials.

Vemurafenib is a targeted therapy, used in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma who carry the BRAF V600E mutation, with a relative reduction of 63% in the risk of death. Several adverse events have been described previously, such as photosensitivity or squamous-cell carcinomas. Two cases of panniculitis have been reported recently with two different selective BRAF inhibitors. We report two cases of neutrophilic panniculitis in patients treated by vemurafenib for a metastatic melanoma. Clinical and biological examinations showed no indications for an immune nor an infectious cause of neutrophilic panniculitis. Thus, we believe that vemurafenib caused this panniculitis. Treatment with vemurafenib was maintained in both patients because of the clinical and radiological tumoral responses. One patient showed spontaneous recovery, whereas the other patient presented several recurrences of panniculitis. We believe that physicians should be aware of this cutaneous side effect of vemurafenib, but it should not lead to discontinuation of this treatment.