Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.

BACKGROUND: Use of whole blood (WB) for trauma resuscitation has seen a resurgence. The purpose of this study was to investigate survival benefit of WB across a diverse population of bleeding trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study of injured patients receiving emergency-release blood products was performed. All adult trauma patients resuscitated between November 2017 and September 2020 were included. The WB group included patients receiving any group O WB units. The component (COMP) group received no WB units, instead relying on fractionated blood (red blood cells, plasma, and platelets). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Given large observed differences in our regression model, post hoc adjustments with inverse probability of treatment were conducted and a propensity score created. Propensity scoring and Poisson regression supported these findings. RESULTS: Of 1,377 patients receiving emergency release blood products, 840 received WB and 537 remained in the COMP arm. WB patients had higher Injury Severity Score (ISS; 27 vs 20), lower field blood pressure (103 vs 114), and higher arrival lactate (4.2 vs 3.5; all p < 0.05). Postarrival transfusions and complications were similar between groups, except for sepsis, which was lower in the WB arm (25 vs 30%, p = 0.041). Although univariate analysis noted similar survival between WB and COMP (75 vs 76%), logistic regression found WB was independently associated with a 4-fold increased survival (odds ratio [OR] 4.10, p < 0.001). WB patients also had a 60% reduction in overall transfusions (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.70). This impact on survival remained regardless of location of transfusion, ISS, or presence of head injury. CONCLUSION: In patients experiencing hemorrhagic shock, WB transfusion is associated with both improved survival and decreased overall blood utilization.

No abstract

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Following advances in blood typing and storage, whole blood transfusion became available for the treatment of casualties during World War I. While substantially utilized during World War II and the Korean War, whole blood transfusion declined during the Vietnam War as civilian centers transitioned to blood component therapies. Little evidence supported this shift, and recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have renewed interest in military and civilian applications of whole blood transfusion. Within the past two decades, civilian trauma centers have begun to study transfusion protocols based upon coldstored, low anti-A/B titer type O whole blood for the treatment of severely injured civilian trauma patients. Early data suggests equivalent or improved resuscitation and hemostatic markers with whole blood transfusion when compared to balanced blood component therapy. Additional studies are taking place to define the optimal way to utilize low-titer type O whole blood in both prehospital and trauma center resuscitation of bleeding patients.

BACKGROUND Because preoperative risk factor modification is generally not possible in the emergency setting, complication prevention represents an important focus for quality improvement in emergency general surgery (EGS). The objective of our study was to determine the overall impact that specific postoperative complications have in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN Our study sample consisted of patients from the 2012–2013 ACS-NSQIP database who underwent an EGS procedure. We used population attributable fractions (PAFs) to estimate the overall impact that each of 8 specific complications had on 30-day physiologic and resource use outcomes in our study population. The PAF represents the percentage reduction in a given outcome that would be anticipated if a complication were able to be completely prevented in our study population. Both unadjusted and risk-adjusted PAFs were calculated. RESULTS There were 79,183 patients included for analysis. The most common complications in these patients were bleeding (6.2%), incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (3.4%), pneumonia (2.7%), and organ/space SSI (2.6%). Bleeding was the complication with the greatest overall impact on mortality and end-organ dysfunction, demonstrating an adjusted PAF of 10.7% (95% CI 8.2%,13.1%, p < 0.001) and 15.9% (95% CI 13.9%, 16.7%, p < 0.001) for these respective outcomes. The only other complication with a sizeable impact on these outcomes was pneumonia (adjusted PAF of 7.9% for mortality and 13.2% for pneumonia). In contrast, complications such as urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and incisional SSI had negligible impacts on these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides a framework for the development of high-value quality initiatives in EGS.

The evaluation and management of patients with abdominal vascular trauma or injury requires immediate and effective decision-making in these unfavorable circumstances. The majority of these patients arrive at trauma centers in profound shock, secondary to massive blood loss, which is often unrelenting. Moreover, ischemia, compartment syndrome, thrombosis, and embolization may also be life threatening and require immediate intervention. To minimize the risk of these potentially lethal complications, early understanding of the disease process and emergent therapeutic intervention are necessary. In the literature, the management of acute traumatic vascular injuries is restricted to traditional open surgical techniques. However, in penetrating injuries surgeons often face a potentially contaminated field, which renders the placement of prosthetic grafts inappropriate. Currently, however, there are sparse data on the management of vascular trauma with endovascular techniques. The role of endovascular technique in penetrating abdominal vascular trauma, which is almost always associated with severe active bleeding, is limited. It is worth mentioning that hybrid operating rooms with angiographic radiology capabilities offer more opportunities for the management of this kind of injuries by either temporary control of the devastating bleeding using endovascular balloon tamponade or with embolization and stenting. On the other hand, blunt abdominal injuries are less dangerous and they could be treated at most times by endovascular means. Since surgeons continue to encounter abdominal vascular trauma, open and endovascular techniques will evolve constantly giving us encouraging messages for the near future.

No abstract