No abstract

No abstract

Background. To compare the diagnostic value of thoracoscopic biopsy, fluid cytology, and Abrams needle biopsy, the authors analyzed prospectively the records of 188 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma examined between 1973 and 1990. Symptoms were pleural effusion in 173 patients, empyema in 1, spontaneous pneumothorax in 1, and radiologic tumor without effusion in 13. Methods. Thoracoscopy was performed using a rigid thoracoscope under local anesthesia with neuroleptanalgesia. A total of 10–20 biopsies were taken from the parietal, diaphragmatic, and visceral pleura. Each diagnosis was confirmed by the French panel of mesothelioma pathologists. To prevent parietal seeding, radiation therapy at a dose of 21 Gy was administered during a period of 3 days to all points of entry. Results. Tolerance to thoracoscopy was good. The only complications were subcutaneous emphysema (1 patient), local pleural infection (4 patients), hemorrhage of less than 100 ml (3 patients), and temperature of 38–38.5°C (26 patients). In 137 patients, the cavity was free, and complete endoscopic inspection was achieved. In 51 patients, inspection was limited by adhesions that were severed to obtain biopsy. Nonspecific inflammation was observed in 12 patients (6.5%), nodules in 92 (49%), thickening in 21 (11%), and mixed lesions in 63 (33.5%). Diagnosis was achieved by thoracoscopy in 98% of patients, by fluid cytology in 26%, and by needle biopsy in 21%. Conclusion. In most patients, thoracoscopy allows complete visualization of the pleural cavity and provides high‐quality biopsy samples. The diagnostic accuracy of thoracoscopy is similar to open thoracotomy, but the procedure is far less invasive, usually requiring that the patient remain in the hospital only 1 day.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has risen for some decades and is expected to peak between 2010 and 2020. Up to now, no single treatment has been proven to be effective and death usually occurs within about 12-17 months after diagnosis. Perhaps because of this poor prognosis, early screening has incited little interest. However, certain forms may have a better prognosis when diagnosed early and treated by multimodal therapy or intrapleural immunotherapy. Diagnosis depends foremost on histological analysis of samples obtained by thoracoscopy. This procedure allows the best staging of the pleural cavity with an attempt to detect visceral pleural involvement, which is one of the most important prognostic factors. Although radiotherapy seems necessary and is efficient in preventing the malignant seeding after diagnostic procedures in patients, there has been no randomized phase III study showing the superiority of any treatment compared with another. However, for the early-stage disease (stage I) a logical therapeutic approach seems to be neoadjuvant intrapleural treatment using cytokines. For more advanced disease (stages II and III) resectability should be discussed with the thoracic surgeons and a multimodal treatment combining surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be proposed for a randomized controlled study. Palliative treatment is indicated for stage IV. In any case, each patient should be enrolled in a clinical trial.

A hospital-based case-control study of the association between past occupational exposure to asbestos and pleural mesothelioma was carried out in five regions of France. Between 1987 and 1993, 405 cases and 387 controls were interviewed. The job histories of these subjects were evaluated by a group of experts for exposure to asbestos fibers according to probability, intensity, and frequency. A cumulative exposure index was calculated as the product of these three parameters and the duration of the exposed job, summed over the entire working life. Among men, the odds ratio increased with the probability of exposure and was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-1.9) for possible exposure and 3.6 (95% CI 2.4-5.3) for definite exposure. A dose-response relation was observed with the cumulative exposure index: The odds ratio increased from 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.8) for the lowest exposure category to 8.7 (95% CI 4.1-18.5) for the highest. Among women, the odds ratio for possible or definite exposure was 18.8 (95% CI 4.1-86.2). We found a clear dose-response relation between cumulative asbestos exposure and pleural mesothelioma in a population-based case-control study with retrospective assessment of exposure. A significant excess of mesothelioma was observed for levels of cumulative exposure that were probably far below the limits adopted in most industrial countries during the 1980s.