* This perception underlies Lovins' proposals (1976, 1977) and is the justification for their radical character.-17-9.J Sor~E SPECIFIC H1PACTS OF "SOFr l AND "TRANSITION" TECHNOLOGIES The obstacles and pitfalls in the way of systematic environmental assessment even of well-established energy technologies, as described in Section 2 above. are especially formidable when one considers technologies deployed so far only on a small scale or not at all. Nevertheless, the framework provided facilitates asking some of the right questions about environmental impacts of the "soft" and fltransition" technologies, and consideration of the criteria proposed for evaluating severity permits at least some tentative conclusions. A listing of impacts of possible importance identified in this and previous studies of alternative energy technologies is given in Table iX-5. In what follows, I compare some of the principal soft and transition energy options to more traditional energy supplies with respect to some of the major categories of stresses/responses outlined in Section 2: land ~se, water use, use of nonfuel materials, occuoational accidents and disease, risk to public life and limb through sman accidents, risk of large accidents and sabotage, effects of routine emissions on publ'ic hea'lth, effects on climate, ecological effects, aesthetic effects, and military threats. 9.3.1 Land Use Real land~use effects of dispersed nonelectric energy options are difficult to pin down persuasively. It is often asserted that solar * The actual peak power from those windmills would be greater than 1 GWe and the operating hours per year less than 5700. * large dam (i.e., high one) than for a typical small one. Use of biomass plantations for generating electricity, as opposed to making portable fuels, seems too foolish an idea to be seriously entertained. If plantations are used at all, we will almost certainly need the fuel much more than the electricity, considering the re~~tive abundance of alternative ways to get the latter; and the land-use requirement for an "electricity plantation" in California would be on the order of 2000 km 2 per GWe if eucalyptus biomass capturing 1 percent of incident sunlight could be converted into electricity at 25% efficiency. 9.3.2 Water Use. .. , t .
o u-29-CHAPTER II-(,()-CillstC'red arollnd the Energy Commission and the state PUC: are a large numb~r of divis ions, located a(ln'inistyat~vely within the California Resource Agency, which have their own expertise and veto power to the energy problem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.