OBJECTIVE -To determine the prevalence and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian population and to estimate the time difference between disease onset and clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab) included 11,247 adults aged Ն25 years in 42 randomly selected areas of Australia. Retinopathy was assessed in participants identified as having diabetes (based on self-report and oral glucose tolerance test), impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance and in a random sample with normal glucose tolerance. Data were available for 2,177 participants.RESULTS -Overall, 15.3% of those with diabetes had retinopathy. The prevalence of retinopathy was 21.9% in those with known type 2 diabetes (KDM) and 6.2% in those newly diagnosed (NDM). The prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was 2.1% in those with KDM. No cases of PDR were found in those with NDM. Untreated vision threatening retinopathy (presence of PDR or macular edema) was present in 1.2% (n ϭ 4). Factors associated with retinopathy were duration of diabetes, HbA 1c , and systolic blood pressure. Using linear extrapolation of the prevalence of retinopathy with diabetes duration, the onset of diabetes in this population was approximately the time of diagnosis.CONCLUSIONS -This is one of the first national studies of diabetic retinopathy in a developed country. The prevalence of retinopathy was similar to that in other population-based studies. Vision threatening retinopathy was relatively rare; however, four untreated cases were identified. Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy and more aggressive management of modifiable risk factors could reduce the numbers of people who develop vision-threatening retinopathy. Diabetes Care 26:1731-1737, 2003D iabetic retinopathy is a common complication of diabetes and despite the availability of effective treatment, it remains one of the leading causes of visual loss (1-5). Internationally there have been many studies assessing the prevalence of retinopathy, though few have looked at both those with previously and newly diagnosed diabetes (6 -8), and only one from a developed country has used a nationally representative population (9). Several factors have consistently been identified by both cross-sectional and prospective studies as risk factors in the development of diabetic retinopathy: duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycemic control, and urinary albumin (7,10). Other factors, including BMI, smoking, serum lipids, and Cpeptide, have shown varying results (7, 10 -13).By the time of clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, some individuals already show evidence of diabetic retinopathy (7,14 -16), indicating that diabetes may have been present for several years. Extrapolating the relationship between duration of diabetes and prevalence of retinopathy back to a prevalence of zero, previous studies have estimated that the actual onset of diabetes is up to 12 years befor...
Purpose: There is an urgent need for a more effective intervention to slow or prevent progression of agerelated macular degeneration (AMD) from its early stages to vision-threatening late complications. Subthreshold nanosecond laser (SNL) treatment has shown promise in preclinical studies and a pilot study in intermediate AMD (iAMD) as a potential treatment. We aimed to evaluate the safety of SNL treatment in iAMD and its efficacy for slowing progression to late AMD.Design: The Laser Intervention in Early Stages of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (LEAD) study is a 36month, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial.Participants: Two hundred ninety-two participants with bilateral large drusen and without OCT signs of atrophy. Methods: Participants were assigned randomly to receive Retinal Rejuvenation Therapy (2RT Ò ; Ellex Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia) SNL or sham treatment to the study eye at 6-monthly intervals.Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the time to development of late AMD defined by multimodal imaging (MMI). Safety was assessed by adverse events.Results: Overall, progression to late AMD was not slowed significantly with SNL treatment compared with sham treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33e1.14; P ¼ 0.122). However, a post hoc analysis showed evidence of effect modification based on the coexistence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD; adjusted interaction P ¼ 0.002), where progression was slowed for the 222 participants (76.0%) without coexistent RPD at baseline (adjusted HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09e0.59; P ¼ 0.002), whereas an increased progression rate (adjusted HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.80e8.18; P ¼ 0.112) was observed for the 70 participants (24.0%) with RPD with SNL treatment. Differences between the groups in serious adverse events were not significant.Conclusions: In participants with iAMD without MMI-detected signs of late AMD, no significant difference in the overall progression rate to late AMD between those receiving SNL and sham treatment were observed. However, SNL treatment may have a role in slowing progression for those without coexistent RPD and may be inappropriate in those with RPD, warranting caution when considering treatment in clinical phenotypes with RPD. Our findings provide compelling evidence for further trials of the 2RT Ò laser, but they should not be extrapolated to other short-pulse lasers.
In Type 1 diabetes, serum PEDF levels are associated with microvascular complications, poor vascular health, hyperglycaemia, adiposity and inflammation.
Shared care between local optometrists and hospital-based ophthalmologists can help to reduce patient waiting time for review and offers an opportunity for these two groups of eye care professionals to collaborate in providing localised care for the benefit of patients. However, trust and relationship building need to be further developed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.