Five patients with pseudo-Bartter's syndrome from surreptitious diuretic abuse were compared with six patients with true Bartter's syndrome, diagnosed as a normotensive, hyperreninaemic, hypokalaemic metabolic alkalosis with normal urine chloride excretion, low CH2O/(CH2O+CCl) ratio during maximal water diuresis and negative urine screen for diuretics. The latter was positive for frusemide in four and for hydrochlorothiazide in the remaining pseudo-Bartter's patients. The two groups of patients did not differ as for plasma Na+, Cl-, K+, HCO3-, renin, and aldosterone, while uric acid and Mg2+ were greater in pseudo-Bartter's patients. Daily and fasting urine Na+, Cl- and K+ excretion were less in pseudo-Bartter's patients; however, there was substantial overlap of values between the two groups. Fractional distal solute reabsorption during maximal water diuresis was low in the six patients with Bartter's syndrome and in two pseudo-Bartter's patients; thus, this parameter could not be taken as a specific diagnostic marker of Bartter's syndrome. Frusemide administration, 40 mg i.v., induced a brisk increase of urine flow (11.7-21.8 ml/min), UOsm (148-186 mOsm/kg H2O) and FENa (14.6-24%) in Bartter's syndrome, but not pseudo-Bartter's patients; in all pseudo-Bartter's patients frusemide-induced changes of UOsm (13-97) and FENa (-0.5 to 10.2) were markedly less than in Bartter's syndrome patients. Frusemide resistance in pseudo-Bartter's patients was most probably related to diuretic-induced ECF volume contraction and increased proximal tubule solute reabsorption; in fact fractional lithium clearance (FELi, a marker of post-proximal solute delivery) was low in pseudo-Bartter's, but not in Bartter's syndrome patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Five patients with the clinical patterns of Bartter’s syndrome underwent a series of clearance studies in order to characterize the underlying tubule defect. Free water generation during maximal water diuresis (Ch2o), expressed as percentage of the distal delivery (Ch2o + Ccl), was lower in the patients (72.5 ± 3.2%) than in controls (84.4 ± 5.5, p < 0.0001). During maximal water diuresis and furosemide administration (40 mg i.v. as bolus), NaCl reabsorption along the diluting nephron segments could be separated into 2 components, that occurring in the loop of Henle (DRNaHL) and that occurring in tubule segments beyond the macula densa (DRNaDT): DRnahl was normal, while DRNaDT was reduced (3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.2 ± 2.5 ml/min in controls, p < 0.015). Thus, according to this furosemide protocol, our patients had normal solute reabsorption in the loop of Henle but reduced NaCl reabsorption in tubule segments beyond the macula densa. During 0.9% saline infusion (2 liters in 2 h, after stimulation of distal Na reabsorption with fludrocortisone) fractional excretion (FE) of K showed a linear rise with the increase of FEcI.FEK, however, was much higher in the patients than in controls for every FEci level. In contrast, the infusion of Na2SO4, after fludrocortisone administration, induced similar FEK increases in patients and in controls. Thus, in these patients Na reabsorption in the distal nephron (possibly the cortical collecting tubule) was associated with the generation of a higher than normal electric potential gradient in the presence of CI but not of another poorly reabsorbable anion, such as SO42-. These observations indicate that, in our patients, Henle’s loop function is normal, while the collecting tubule function is abnormal. We suggest that NaCl wasting and enhanced tubular secretion of H+ and K in our patients might result from an abnormally low conductance to CI in distal nephron site(s) where Na reabsorption is electrogenic, possibly the cortical collecting tubule. A larger than normal transtubular electric gradient would be generated by Na reabsorption, causing: (1) a direct stimulation of tubular secretion of K and H+ (leading to hypokalemia and alkalosis) and (2) inhibition of the reabsorption of Na (‘trapped’ into the tubular lumen by electric forces), with consequent extracellular volume contraction, hyperreninemia and hyperaldosteronism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.