As yet, nearly all studies in face and facial affect recognition typically provide only data on the accuracy of processing, invariably also in the absence of reference data on abstract information processing. In this study, accuracy and speed of abstract visuo-spatial processing, face recognition, and facial emotion recognition were investigated in normal school children (7-10 years) and adults (25+/-4 years). In the age range of 7-10 years, accuracy of facial processing hardly increased, while speed did substantially increase with age. Adults, however, were substantially more accurate and faster than children. Differences between facial and abstract information processing were related to type of processing strategy, that is, configural or holistic processing versus featural or piecemeal processing. Improvement in task performance with age is discussed in terms of an enhanced efficiency of the configural organization of facial knowledge (facial information processing tasks), together with a further increase in processing capacity (all tasks). The differential developmental course of speed and accuracy levels indicates that speed is a more sensitive measure when children get older. Moreover, it also suggests that speed of performance, in addition to accuracy, might be successfully used in the assessment of clinical deficits, as has recently been demonstrated in children with autistic disorders of social contact.

No abstract

To create a short screening instrument to investigate the development of ideomotor praxis representation (IPR), 357 normally developing children between the ages of 21/2 and 91/2 years were investigated. The IPR screening consisted of six mimed actions which had to be performed on verbal request. The greatest change in the representational style is the transition from performing the action using the body as the object to performing with an imaginary object (i.e. symbolic representation). This transition suggests a development from a concrete and egocentric level of performance to an abstract and allocentric level. Before the age of 6 years differences are evident between self‐directed and externally directed gestures. The level of symbolic representation has to be dissociated from the degree of motor precision, which shows hardly any improvement after 6 years of age. With the proposed model one may interpret the level of IPR in clinical practice. IPR screening is clinically relevant from the age of 41/2 years onwards.

To create a short screening instrument to investigate the development of ideomotor praxis representation (IPR), 357 normally developing children between the ages of 2 1/2 and 9 1/2 years were investigated. The IPR screening consisted of six mimed actions which had to be performed on verbal request. The greatest change in the representational style is the transition from performing the action using the body as the object to performing with an imaginary object (i.e. symbolic representation). This transition suggests a development from a concrete and egocentric level of performance to an abstract and allocentric level. Before the age of 6 years differences are evident between self-directed and externally directed gestures. The level of symbolic representation has to be dissociated from the degree of motor precision, which shows hardly any improvement after 6 years of age. With the proposed model one may interpret the level of IPR in clinical practice. IPR screening is clinically relevant from the age of 4 1/2 years onwards.

No abstract