Dr Vandrey had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

This study sought to develop and validate an integrated laboratory paradigm of sexual aggression and bystander intervention. Participants were a diverse community sample (54% African American) of heterosexual males (N = 156) between 21 and 35 years of age who were recruited to complete the study with a male friend and an ostensibly single, heterosexual female who reported a strong dislike of sexual content in the media. Participants viewed a sexually explicit or nonsexually explicit film clip as part of contrived media rating task and made individual choices of which film clip to show the female confederate. Immediately thereafter, participants were required to reach consensus on a group decision of which film clip to show the female confederate. Subjecting a target to an unwanted experience with a sexual connotation was operationalized as selection of the sexually explicit video, whereas successful bystander intervention was operationalized as the event of one partner individually selecting the sexually explicit video but then selecting the nonsexually explicit video for the group choice. Results demonstrated that a 1-year history of sexual aggression and endorsement of pertinent misogynistic attitudes significantly predicted selection of the sexually-explicit video. In addition, bystander efficacy significantly predicted men's successful prevention of their male peer's intent to show the female confederate a sexually explicit video. Discussion focused on how these data inform future research and bystander intervention programming for sexual aggression.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19 turned into a global pandemic in March 2020. During these unprecedented times, there is an increased demand in medical and personal protective equipment (PPE). Since the supplies may take a long time to meet the global demand, reusing PPEs will help health care workers in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To ensure the safety and well-being of the medical first responders, PPE needs to be sterilized before reuse. In this review, we examine various sterilization techniques that can be used to sterilize PPEs and point out its limitations. The objective is to provide a foundation of knowledge incorporating different sterilization techniques that allow hospitals and clinics to pick the most suitable technique for sterilization of a particular PPE.

This study investigated the mediating effect of trait aggressivity on the relation between agreeableness and alcohol-related aggression in a laboratory setting. Participants were 116 healthy male social drinkers between 21 and 30 years of age. Agreeableness and trait aggressivity were measured using the Big Five Inventory and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, respectively. Following the consumption of an alcohol or no-alcohol control beverage, participants completed a modified version of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, in which electric shocks were received from and administered to a fictitious opponent during a competitive task. Aggression was operationalized as the proportion of the most extreme shocks delivered to the fictitious opponent under conditions of low and high provocation. Results indicated that lower levels of agreeableness were associated with higher levels of trait aggressivity. In turn, higher levels of trait aggressivity predicted extreme aggression in intoxicated, but not sober, participants under low, but not high, provocation. Findings highlight the importance of examining determinants of intoxicated aggression within a broader theoretical framework of personality.

The present research assessed self-reported reactions to participation in a laboratory aggression paradigm immediately postexperiment and at 1-week follow-up. Method: Three hundred nineteen men completed a competitive laboratory aggression task that involved deception and mild electric shocks that were received from, and administered to, a fictitious opponent. Participants' aggressive ideation was assessed immediately after participation, whereas their aggressive ideation and self-reported reactions to experimental procedures were assessed approximately 1 week later. Results: Participation did not increase respondents' self-reported likelihood of engaging in aggressive behavior after completing the aggression task or at 1-week follow-up. The percentage of participants who reported inflicted insight was extremely low (approximately 1%), and this experience was associated with little distress. At 1-week follow-up, 98% of participants reported little or no adverse effects in response to the use of deception and electric shocks. Conclusion: The likelihood of adverse consequences in response to participation in laboratory aggression research is low. Of particular importance, participation is not associated with inflicted insight or an increased likelihood of engaging in aggression following participation. Findings may assist institutional review boards and researchers in making more informed analyses of the risks and benefits of laboratory aggression research.