Over the past few decades, interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has increased tremendously due to its core principle of minimizing approach-related injury while providing outcomes similar to traditional open spine procedures. With technical and technological advancements, MISS has expanded its utility not only to simple spinal stenosis, but also to complex spinal pathologies such as metastasis, trauma, or adult spinal deformity. In this article, we review the techniques and technology in MISS and discuss the indications, benefits, and limitations of MISS.
Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is associated with a relatively high incidence of chronic triceps insufficiency, but there is difficulty in treatment. This case series describes reconstruction with Achilles allografts using the keyhole technique in patients with postoperative chronic triceps insufficiency. Fourteen patients who underwent reconstruction for triceps insufficiency after TEA were included in the study. During this procedure, a keyhole-shaped osteotomy was performed on the proximal olecranon, and a fragment of the calcaneal allograft was shaped into a bone plug to fit the olecranon. The clinical outcomes were assessed in all patients 12 months after reconstruction and at last follow-up (range, 13–54 months). After 12 months, patients had a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 84.3 (range, 75–100), and all achieved a marked improvement compared with before reconstruction (mean, 42.7; range, 20–75). Seven, 4, and 3 patients achieved excellent, good, and fair outcomes, respectively. The mean extension peak torque of the operated-on arm was 34.91 Nm (range, 16.3–63.9 Nm), and the percentage of extension peak torque of the operated-on arm to the opposite arm was from 14.5% preoperative to 76.2% 12 months postoperative. This case series suggests that triceps reconstruction with an Achilles tendon using the keyhole technique is a useful treatment option for triceps insufficiency after TEA. [
Orthopedics
. 2021;44(4):e498–e502.]
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Background: Current evaluation of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is mainly based on radiographic parameters derived from X-rays. However, due to their static nature, X-rays fall short of assessing the dynamic functionalities including balance, gait, and the risk of falling. This study aimed to determine the functionalities of ASD patients by measuring functional mobility tests (FMTs) and compared relationships between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with FMTs and radiographic parameters to prove whether FMTs are useful evaluation tools for evaluation of patients with ASD. Methods: This age- and sex-matched case-control study included 66 patients with ASD and 66 patients with LSS, all of whom were scheduled to undergo spinal surgery. All patients were evaluated with four FMTs including alternate step test (AST), six-meter walk test (SMT), sit-to-stand test (STS), and timed up and go test (TUGT). Correlations of the PROs with FMTs and static radiographic parameters were analyzed. Results: The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. However, compared with patients with LSS, those with ASD showed significantly poorer performance on all four FMTs, spending significantly more time performing the SMT, STS, and TUGT (P = 0.046, 0.045, and 0.015, respectively). The results of the four FMTs were significantly correlated with the ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores only in the ASD group and not in the LSS group. Conclusions: FMTs were appropriate tools for assessing the dynamic functionalities of patients with ASD. FMTs might play a bridging role between static radiographic parameters and subjective PROs when treating patinets with ASD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.