No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND Among various cardiac autoantibodies (AAb), those recognizing the β1 adrenergic receptor (β1AR) demonstrate agonist-like effects and induce myocardial damage that can be reversed by β-blockers and immunoglobulin G3 (IgG3) immunoadsorption. OBJECTIVES We investigated the role of β1AR-AAbs belonging to the IgG3 subclass in patients with recent-onset cardiomyopathy. METHODS Peripheral blood was drawn at enrollment in subjects with recent-onset cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤0.40; <6 months). Presence of IgG and IgG3-β1AR-AAb was determined and echocardiograms assessed at baseline and 6 months. Subjects were followed for up to 4 years. RESULTS Among the 353 enrolled subjects, 62 (18%) were positive for IgG3-β1AR-AAb (IgG3), 58 (16%) were positive for IgG but not IgG3 (non-IgG3), and the remaining were negative. There were no significant differences in baseline systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or LVEF among the groups at baseline. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic (LVEDD and LVESD, respectively) diameters were significantly larger in the non-IgG3 group compared to the other groups (LVEDD: p < 0.01; LVESD: p = 0.03). At 6 months, LVEF was significantly higher in the IgG3 group (p = 0.007). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated IgG3-β1AR-AAb was an independent predictor of LVEF at 6 months and change in LVEF over 6 months, even after multivariable adjustment (LVEF at 6 months, β = 0.20, p = 0.01; change in LVEF, β = 0.20, p = 0.008). In the subjects with high New York Heart Association functional class (III or IV) at baseline, the IgG3 group had lower incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death, cardiac transplantation, and hospitalization due to heart failure, whereas the non-IgG3 group had the highest incidence of the composite endpoint. CONCLUSIONS IgG3-β1AR-AAb was associated with more favorable myocardial recovery in patients with recent-onset cardiomyopathy.

No abstract

No abstract

The AFFIRM Study enrolled 4060 predominantly elderly patients with atrial fibrillation to compare ventricular rate control with rhythm control. The patients in the AFFIRM Study were representative of patients at high risk for complications from atrial fibrillation, which indicates that the results of this large clinical trial will be relevant to patient care.

No abstract

Physicians ranging from primary care providers to subspecialists agree on issues of AF management such as heart rate control and anticoagulation. Attitudes vary widely about issues such as antiarrhythmic drugs.