This treatment protocol presents an alternative approach to overriding distal radial fractures in children and provides the orthopaedic surgeon a simple, effective, and cost and time-efficient method of treatment.

Background:Brazilian jiu-jitsu (BJJ) is a unique style of martial arts with rapid growth in the United States and internationally. Although studies have examined injuries in other martial arts and combat sports, to date, no published medical study has examined injuries in BJJ competitions.Purpose:(1) To estimate the incidence of injuries in BJJ competitions and (2) to identify and describe the types and mechanisms of injuries associated with competitive BJJ.Study Design:Descriptive epidemiology study.Methods:Injury data were obtained from records of on-site medical coverage at 8 statewide BJJ tournaments in Hawaii, USA, between 2005 and 2011.Results:The identified injury incidence on the day of matches was 9.2 per 1000 exposures (46 injuries out of 5022 exposures, ie, match participations). Orthopaedic injuries were the most common and accounted for 78% of all injuries (n = 36), followed by costochondral or rib injuries (n = 7) and lacerations requiring medical care (n = 3). The elbow was found to be the joint most commonly injured during BJJ competitions, with the arm bar being the most common mechanism. We propose that this BJJ-specific injury mechanism, the “arm bar,” be recognized as another mechanism of hyperextension injury to the elbow in sports.Conclusion:Comparison of the BJJ injury data with injury data reported for judo, taekwondo, wrestling, and mixed martial arts showed that BJJ competitors were at substantially lower risk of injury compared with these other sports. With orthopaedic injuries being most common and the elbow being the area most vulnerable to injury in BJJ, it is important that participants, referees, and physicians be properly educated about the unique mechanisms of injury that can occur, particularly to the elbow.

Level IV-case series.

No abstract

Background: Angulated wrist and forearm fractures are among the most common pediatric fractures, and they often require closed reduction with anesthesia. There are several issues associated with pediatric anesthesia including the low but non-zero risk of significant complications, increased physician and staff time and effort, and increased cost. Despite these issues, there have not been any studies to prove that using anesthesia results in better outcomes or higher caregiver satisfaction in comparison to performing closed reductions without anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of closed reductions of angulated pediatric wrist and forearm fractures and to determine caregiver satisfaction with an anesthesia-free reduction technique. Methods: This study included 54 pediatric patients with closed, angulated fractures of the radius or combined radial and ulnar shafts. All closed reductions were performed by a single pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon in the office setting without any anesthesia. Radiographs were obtained to assess the quality of the reduction. At the first follow-up visit, caregivers were asked about their interim use of pain medications. Caregivers were later surveyed about patient use of analgesics and their satisfaction with an anesthesia-free reduction technique. Results: The average age of the 54 patients in this study was 9 years (1.8 to 16.8 y). Thirty-three fractures were combined radial and ulnar forearm shaft fractures, 18 were distal radius fractures, and 3 were radial shaft fractures. ≤ 10 degrees of residual angulation was achieved in 98% of patients. Nine percent (5/54) of the patients used ibuprofen or acetaminophen for pain control. Seventy eight percent (42/54) of the caregivers responded to the telephone and email surveys. All responding caregivers stated that the patients returned to full function and had satisfactory outcomes. Ninety eight percent (41/42) of the caregivers stated they would choose the same anesthesia-free reduction technique again. Conclusions: Closed reduction of angulated pediatric wrist and forearm fractures in the office without anesthesia can achieve satisfactory reductions and high caregiver satisfaction while eliminating the risks and complications associated with pediatric anesthesia. Level of Evidence: Level IV Case series.