Holocord spinal abscesses are a rare entity. The source of the disease can be hemopoietic spread or contagious spread. The dermal sinus tract is major risk factor for contagious spread. The major hemopoietic sources are urogenital infection, endocarditis, and infective lung diseases. The hemopoietic spread is a more common source for pediatric patients. The thoracolumbar region is the most common site of involvement. Spinal infection has a tendency to extend longitudinally throughout spinal fibers. The pathogenesis of the holocord edema or syrinx is uncertain. The underlying etiology may be inflammation, infection, and associated venous congestion within the spinal canal. Also, CSF circulation alteration due to arachnoiditis may be another etiological factor. The most important entities on outcome are appropriate surgical treatment and antibiotic administration.
Background/aim: Upper lumbar disc herniation (LDH), generally involving L1?L2 and L2?L3 level herniation, is less common than lower LDH and, in this retrospective study, the clinical and radiological findings of patients who suffered from upper LDH and were operated on due to this pathology were reviewed. Materials and methods: Data regarding neurological and radiological findings of patients operated on between January 2005 and December 2013 were retrospectively collected. During this period, 3494 patients had surgery for LDH, and 129 of these patients had disc herniation at the upper levels. Seventy-eight patients with proper follow-up and data were included in the study. Results: There were 39 males and 39 females enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients (0.6%) were operated on due to L1?L2 disc herniation and 45 (1.2%) had L2?L3 disc herniation. Twelve (0.3%) patients had disc pathologies at both levels. The mean age of the population was 59.9 years old, and this was significantly higher than lower LDH averages previously described in the literature (42 years old). Cauda equina signs and urinary disturbances were frequently seen, in addition to symptoms related to back and leg pain, neurologic claudication, and weakness in lower extremities. Conclusion: Upper LDHs requiring surgical therapy are extremely rare, more so than other LDHs. They are more frequent among older patients and are often present along with signs of cauda equina and urinary dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE Cerebral cavernous malformation (CM) is an angiographically occult vascular pathology. Although microsurgery is the gold standard treatment to control the symptoms of CM, resection carries high risk in some situations, especially eloquent areas. The objective was to evaluate annual hemorrhage rates (AHRs) before and after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of cerebral CM in different locations. METHODS A total of 195 patients (119 women and 76 men) with CM treated at the Gazi University Gamma Knife Center between April 2005 and June 2017 were analyzed. The mean ± SD follow-up period was 67.4 ± 31.1 months (range 12 days to 170 months). AHR before SRS, AHR after SRS, morbidity associated with radiation, seizure control rate after SRS, lesion volume, coexistence with developmental venous anomaly, and SRS treatment parameters were analyzed, with evaluation of radiological data and clinical charts performed retrospectively. The seizure control rate was assessed using the Engel outcome scale. RESULTS The AHR before SRS was 15.3%. Application of SRS to these patients significantly reduced the AHR rates to 2.6% during the first 2 years after treatment and to 1.4% thereafter. Favorable seizure control (Engel class I and II) after radiosurgery was achieved in 23 patients (88.5%) with epilepsy. Radiation-related temporary complications occurred in 15.4% of patients, and permanent morbidity occurred in 4.6%. CONCLUSIONS SRS is a safe and effective treatment modality for reducing the hemorrhage risk of CM. The authors suggest that SRS should be considered for the treatment of patients with CM, high surgical risks, and hemorrhage history, instead of a using a wait-and-see policy.
OBJECTIVEDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, neurosurgeons all around the globe continue to operate in emergency cases using new self-protective measures. Personal protective equipment (PPE) use is recommended in all surgeries. The authors have experienced varying degrees of field of view (FOV) loss under the surgical microscope with different PPE. Herein, they aimed to investigate the effects of different PPE on FOV while using the surgical microscope.METHODSFifteen neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents participated in this study. Three kinds of PPE (safety spectacles, blast goggles, and face shields) were tested while using a surgical microscope. FOV was measured using a 12 × 12–cm checkered sheet of paper on which every square had an area of 25 mm2 under the microscope. The surgical microscope was positioned perpendicular to the test paper, and the zoom was fixed. Each participant marked on the test sheet the peripheral borders of their FOV while using different PPE and without wearing any PPE. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was a significant difference in FOV values with the different PPE.RESULTSFOV was significantly different between each PPE (F[3, 42] = 6339.845, p < 0.0005). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant decrease in the FOV from the naked eye (9305.33 ± 406.1 mm2) to blast goggles (2501.91 ± 176.5 mm2) and face shields (92.33 ± 6.4 mm2). There were no significant FOV changes with the safety spectacles (9267.45 ± 410.5 mm2).CONCLUSIONSWhile operating under a surgical microscope safety spectacles provide favorable FOVs. Face shields increase the eye piece–pupil distance, which causes a severe reduction in FOV.
AIm: Meningioma literature has many large surgical case series, which have been references of text books and neurosurgical practice. Many of those series were published when stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was not so common or these series were in terms of World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 classification. In this study, we aimed to make an update to the current literature using WHO 2007 classification system. mATERIAl and mEThODS: Four hundred eighty-eight intracranial meningioma patients underwent open surgery in 2007-2013 and 449 of them were included in this study. All pathological specimens were re-evaluated in terms of WHO 2007 classification. All demographical and follow-up records and imaging archives were investigated by using our center's central automation system and National Central Population Management System. If records were not available or not adequate, investigators made phone calls to patients. Pediatric patients were excluded. RESulTS:Three hundred twenty-six female (76.2%) and 123 male (27.4%) patients were analyzed. Their ages ranged from 18 to 84 years (mean=51.6±11.9 years). The most common subtype of meningioma was meningothelial meningioma (51.7%), followed by atypical meningioma (20.3%). WHO Grade I meningiomas had statistically random localization distribution, but WHO Grade II meningiomas were more common in the convexity, parasagittal and middle fossa. Younger age was found to be significantly related with tumor recurrence or progression. Seventy-three (16.2%) patients underwent SRS and 64 (14.2%) patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after surgery. Convexity localization was found to be associated with recurrence, mortality and higher WHO 2007 grade.CONCluSION: Convexity meningiomas are associated with recurrence, mortality and higher WHO 2007 grade. Convexity meningiomas should be totally resected in order to achieve maximum benefit from surgery,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.