This paper examines the mode of governmentality applicable as an analytical framework in socialist states committed to market socialism. The successes of socialist states like China and Vietnam over the past few decades since their market-based reforms are attributable to this diversifying mode of governmentality and have challenged the binary dichotomy between socialism and neoliberalism. The party-states in China and Vietnam have begun to search for a post-socialist mode of governmentality, which resonates with the departure from neoliberalism towards post-neoliberalism in various capitalist countries. In Vietnam, there are signs of reconfiguration and restructuring of the party-states in such a highly complicated and fluid context to adapt themselves to a more sustainable governmentality. This results in the amorphous and ambivalent situation of a double movement of accommodating and resisting neoliberalism. That, in turn, reveals significant implications for a transformative potential for political change.
The paper explores contestations playing out in constitutional debates around the 1992 constitutional amendments with a focal point in the exercise of discursive power and struggles for change. The paper discusses the significance of conflict in the constitutional reform process re-initiated in 2011. It demonstrates how the emphasis on stability and harmonious integration in initial constitutional amendment proposals has been compromised and renegotiated in the face of sustained criticisms of the constitution that draw on non-orthodox ideological foundations. The contestations that characterize constitutional reform discourse reveals how conflict is a significant driver of the changes presently underway in Vietnam.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.