AimsCryothermal energy (CTE) ablation via a balloon catheter (Arctic Front, Cryocath™) represents a novel technology for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, balloon-based PVI approaches are associated with phrenic nerve palsy (PNP). We investigated whether ‘single big cryoballoon’-deployed CTE lesions can (i) achieve acute electrical PVI without left atrium (LA) imaging and (ii) avoid PNP in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).Methods and resultsAfter double transseptal punctures, one Lasso catheter and a big 28 mm cryoballoon catheter using a steerable sheath were inserted into the LA. PV angiography and ostial Lasso recordings from all PVs were obtained. Selective PV angiography was used to evaluate balloon to LA–PV junction contact. CTE ablation lasted 300 s, and the PN was paced during freezing at right-sided PVs. Twenty-seven patients (19 males, mean age: 56 ± 9 years, LA size: 42 ± 5 mm) with PAF (mean duration: 6.6 ± 5.7 years) were included. PVI was achieved in 97/99 PVs (98%). Median (Q1; Q3) procedural, balloon, and fluoroscopy times were 220 min (190; 245), 130 min (90; 170), and 50 min (42; 69), respectively. Three transient PNP occurred after distal PV ablations. No PV stenosis occurred. Total median (Q1; Q3) follow-up time was 271 days (147; 356), and 19 of 27 patients (70%) remained in sinus rhythm (3-month blanking period).ConclusionUsing the single big cryoballoon technique, almost all PVs (98%) could be electrically isolated without LA imaging and may reduce the incidence of PNP as long as distal ablation inside the septal PVs is avoided.

No abstract

CPVI alone is sufficient to restore SR in 43.2% of patients with long-standing persistent AF. Multiple procedures and additional ablation strategies with a significant risk of inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation are often required to maintain stable SR.

Background-Data regarding the freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) in the follow-up of persistent AF patients is limited.The second-generation cryoballoon has better cooling properties compared with first-generation cryoballon. In this study, we aimed to assess the medium-term efficacy of second-generation cryoballoon in patients with persistent AF. Methods and Results-A total of 100 patients (63±10 years, 80% male) with symptomatic persistent AF, despite ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug(s), who were scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation cryoballoon were enrolled in this study. Follow-up was based on outpatient clinic visits, including Holter ECGs. Recurrence was defined as a symptomatic or documented arrhythmia episode of >30 seconds excluding a 3-month blanking period. As a result, 393 pulmonary veins (7 patients with common ostium) were successfully isolated. Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 96.2±21.3 and 19.7±6.7 minutes, respectively. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 3% (3/100) of the patients. At a mean follow-up duration of 10.6±6.3 months, 67% of the patients were in sinus rhythm. Stepwise multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that early AF recurrence (hazard ratio 3.83, 95% confidence interval 1.91-7.68, P<0.001) was the only independent predictor for late AF recurrence apart from other clinical and echocardiographic variables. Conclusions-Our findings indicated that second-generation cryoballoon use is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with persistent AF. Recurrence at blanking period was the only predictor of long-term AF recurrence.

A high incidence of thermal esophageal injury including a perforation was noted following robotic PVI using 30 W along the posterior LA wall. During RN-based PVI procedures esophageal temperature monitoring is advocated. Reduction of ablation power to 20 W and termination of energy delivery at T(eso) of 41 degrees C significantly reduced the risk of esophageal injury.

Today, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the dominant indication for catheter ablation in big electrophysiologists (EP) centres. AF ablation strategies are complex and technically challenging. Therefore, it would be desirable that technical innovations pursue the goal to improve catheter stability to increase the procedural success and most importantly to increase safety by helping to avoid serious complications. The most promising technical innovation aiming at the aforementioned goals is remote catheter navigation and ablation. To date, two different systems, the NIOBE magnetic navigation system (MNS, Stereotaxis, USA) and the Sensei robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen Medical, USA), are commercially available. The following review will introduce the basic principles of the systems, will give an insight into the merits and demerits of remote navigation, and will further focus on the initial clinical experience at our centre with focus on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures.

Conduction gaps after CB-1 and CB-2 were higher in inferior PVs compared to superior PVs. The RIPV and minimum CB temperature were independent predictors of PV electrical reconnection after CB-2.

Background-Lack of an irrigated-tip magnetic catheter has limited the role of remote-controlled magnetic navigation (Niobe II, Stereotaxis) for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results-A novel 3.5-mm-tip irrigated magnetic catheter (group 1, Thermocool Navistar RMT, Biosense Webster) was used for 3D left atrial reconstruction (CARTO RMT) and remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation. A redesigned catheter was used in group 2. The primary end point was wide area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation confirmed by spiral catheter recording during ablation; secondary end points included procedural data, complications, and AF recurrence.