The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of clinically relevant doses of repository corticotropin injection (Acthar Gel) and synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot have not been fully characterized. We compared the steroidogenic exposure of repository corticotropin injection and synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot in healthy adults at therapeutic doses using data from 2 separate phase 1 studies. Subjects were randomly assigned to repository corticotropin injection 40 or 80 IU subcutaneously twice weekly or 80 IU subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 15 days or to daily synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot doses of 0.5 mg subcutaneously, 0.75 mg subcutaneously, 1 mg subcutaneously, or 1 mg intramuscularly for 5 days. A population PK/PD model was developed to simulate the free cortisol exposure of a clinically relevant dose of synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot (1 mg subcutaneously twice weekly). Study drug doses were converted to methylprednisolone‐equivalent doses using the steroidogenic exposure of methylprednisolone 16 mg daily as a conversion factor. Doses were also converted to prednisone equivalents using a coefficient of 1.25. These analyses revealed that the steroidogenic exposure of repository corticotropin injection at clinically relevant doses was substantially lower than that for synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot. The 3 repository corticotropin injection regimens were equivalent to approximately 5, 8, and 16 mg of daily prednisone, respectively. On the basis of simulated free cortisol exposure, synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot 1 mg subcutaneously twice weekly was comparable to 57 mg of daily prednisone. These results suggest that repository corticotropin injection has pharmacological effects that cannot be considered identical to synthetic ACTH1‐24 depot.

Repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar Gel) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) analogs and other pituitary peptides. This phase 1, single-center, open-label, randomized parallel study directly compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RCI and synthetic ACTH 1-24 depot. Methylprednisolone was included to estimate the steroidogenic exposure of RCI and synthetic ACTH 1-24 depot when used to treat nephrotic syndrome. A total of 48 healthy subjects aged 18 to 50 years were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to RCI (80 IU subcutaneously twice weekly on study days 1 and 4), synthetic ACTH 1-24 depot (1 mg subcutaneously twice weekly on study days 1 and 4), or methylprednisolone (32 mg orally once daily on study days 1 through 6). After 2 doses, RCI induced about 5-fold lower free cortisol exposure and an estimated 4-fold lower steroidogenic exposure than synthetic ACTH 1-24 depot. The lower endogenous cortisol response of RCI was achieved despite higher observed mean plasma concentrations of N25-deamidated porcine ACTH 1-39 (the pharmacokinetic marker for RCI) than of ACTH 1-24 . The different pharmacodynamic properties demonstrated by RCI and synthetic ACTH 1-24 depot in this study suggest that these products in the ACTH class are not interchangeable.

Background and Purpose: Effective relapse treatment is critical for minimizing disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar® Gel) has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of MS exacerbations. However, there is limited real-world evidence available regarding the relationship between the use of RCI for MS relapses and patient demographics, disease characteristics, and dosing regimens. In this multicenter, prospective, observational registry, patients receiving RCI for acute MS relapse were characterized, and recovery and safety outcomes were described.Methods: Patients were invited by their treating clinician to participate in the registry during a routine care visit. The decision to initiate RCI occurred before determination of study eligibility. All treatment decisions were made at the discretion of the patient's health care provider and were not mandated by the study design or protocol. Each enrolled patient was followed for up to 24 Months or until the date of study termination. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in MS Impact Scale Version 1 (MSIS-29v1) physical subscale scores at Month 2. Additional assessments included the MSIS-29v1 psychological subscale, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: MS (WPAI:MS), and Health Resource Utilization (HRU) questionnaire.Results: Of 145 patients enrolled, 82 (56.6%) completed 24 Months of follow-up. Mean MSIS-29v1 physical subscale scores improved at 2 Months (−8.0; P = 0.0002) and 6 Months (−9.6; P < 0.0001). Mean MSIS-29v1 psychological subscale scores also improved at 2 Months (−7.9; P = 0.0040) and 6 Months (−9.9; P = 0.0012). Mean EDSS scores improved at 2 Months (−0.4; P < 0.0001) and 6 Months (−0.5; P < 0.0001). CGI-I scores indicated improvement in 63.4% of 71 patients at 2 Months and 61.4% of 57 patients at 6 Months (both P < 0.0001). Improvements on the WPAI:MS activity impairment domain (P < 0.001) and reductions in outpatient, specialist, and emergency department visits were observed at 2 and 6 Months. A total of 35 (28.0%) patients reported 83 adverse events; 11 (8.8%) patients reported 16 serious adverse events.Conclusions: This observational study found significant improvements in MS assessment scores after RCI treatment and supports the efficacy and tolerability of RCI for MS relapse.Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT02633033.

Aim: To determine whether clinicians evaluate American Academy of Neurology (AAN) quality metrics for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and whether repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these metrics at 2 and 6 months after treatment. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational registry evaluating patients receiving RCI for MS relapse (N = 125) categorized data according to AAN quality metrics involving diagnosis, disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life. Results: Clinicians assessed all 11 AAN quality metrics in patients with MS relapse. Disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life outcomes improved with RCI therapy. Conclusion: RCI was associated with improved quality metrics, and AAN guidelines were followed during routine RCI treatment for MS relapse.

No abstract