In the antibiotic era, aortic aneurysm is a rare complication of syphilis, what makes the diagnostic assumption even more difficult. Nonetheless, this condition should be suspected in patients with aortic aneurysm. Reports of aortic dissection complicating syphilitic aortitis have been distinctly rare in the literature, and their cause-effect relationship has not been definitely established. In this case report, we present a 62-year-old woman with aortic aneurysm and dissection associated with an unexpected diagnosis of syphilitic aortitis.

Objective: The diagnosis of ventricular preexcitation syndromes is often occasional and with underestimated risk, showing controversies in its stratification and indication of prophylactic ablation. This work aims to explore and summarize the data in the literature, exposing the authors’ conclusions regarding this review. Methods: The authors prepared this work based on the latest guideline of the European Society of Cardiology plus a search for articles published in MEDLINE whose titles related to sudden death from ventricular fibrillation in patients with ventricular preexcitation. Discussion: Sudden death secondary to preexcited atrial fibrillation with degeneration to ventricular fibrillation is the most feared event in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, has an average annual incidence of 0.15 to 0.39%, affecting individuals with structurally normal heart. The noninvasive stratification methods do not demonstrate adequate efficacy, and an electrophysiological study is recommended for all cases at the time of diagnosis. The most severe criteria for sudden death are shortest preexcited RR interval ≤ 250 ms (SPERRI or SPRRI); accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP) ≤ 250 ms; presence of multiple accessory bundles; shortest paced cycle length with preexcitation during atrial pacing ≤ 250ms (SPPCL); Ebstein anomaly; induction of sustained supraventricular tachycardia. Conclusion: The low rate of complications during the diagnostic exam as well as in the therapeutic procedure, added to the high percentage of success of radiofrequency ablation, leads to indicate early the execution of electrophysiological study as a more diligent and accurate measure in the reduction of sudden death events in patients with ventricular preexcitation syndromes.

No abstract

Background: Cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction corresponds to half of the cardiac failure cases, having a similar prognosis to patients with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac sudden death is responsible to about one quarter of the death on these patients. Despite some trials were intended to identify patients with a higher risk to these outcome, it is not already know: how we should proceed to stratify the risk of sudden death in this patients. Methods: To assess the profile of patients with cardiac sudden death and cardiac failure with preserved ejection fraction, we did a literature review, searching for the newer articles about the theme. Outcome: Several trials were published involving patients with divers characteristics that can help us to identify patients with a higher risk of sudden death. The publication of risk score demonstrated that would be possible to identify patients with a >10% risk of sudden death in 5 years, what would be equivalent to the risk of reduced ejection fraction patients eligible to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Trials with electrophysiological study and programmed ventricular stimulation showed a good strategy to identify low risk patients for future arrhythmic events. Conclusion: Sudden death must be a target of the therapy in the patients with preserved heart failure. Efforts should be done with the objective to identify higher risk patients and search for the better risk stratification strategy, and after that, the definition of the benefit or not, of the invasive therapy as ICD.

Introduction: Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, as causes of sudden cardiac death, are entities with mechanisms poorly studied and understood to date. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a simple tool, but with great diagnostic and prognostic value, which has allowed the identification of certain markers associated with increased risk of development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Methods: To identify the electrocardiographic markers related to the risk of developing idiopathic malignant ventricular arrhythmias, a review of the literature was performed, looking for the most recent articles with the greatest scientific impact on the topic. Outcome: Although the number of studies published to date is scarce, the published evidence has shown three electrocardiographic risk markers that have emerged in recent years and which have been related to the development of idiopathic malignant ventricular arrhythmias: the early repolarization (ER) pattern, QRS fragmentation (QRSF) and the Tpeak-Tend (Tp-Te) interval. The ECG marker that has shown most evidence to date is the pattern of ER, as a cause of changes in both ventricular depolarization and repolarization. The QRSF and the Tp-Te interval have also been related to the development of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, although with less evidence in this regard. Conclusion: In the last years, three electrocardiographic markers have appeared as variables related to the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, as is the case of ER, QRSF and Tp-Te interval. However, evidence is scarce in this specific patient profile and further randomized clinical trials are necessary to demonstrate its true relationship and usefulness.

COVID-19 emerged as a viral infection causing severe acute respiratory syndrome, taking global proportions in 2020, with significant impact on public health. The scenario has become alarming since the infection is more severe in patients with cardiovascular diseases, mortality being up to four-fold greater in these patients, as compared to the general population. As a probable contributor, the prothrombotic inflammatory state has been subject of discussion among scientists, with no consolidated treatments in the short and long term. We describe the case of a young patient, with no cardiovascular risk factors, with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction caused by coronary thrombosis, in the late period after COVID-19 infection, and reviewed the most recent recommendations for its treatment.