Considering the potential of white mold, caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, to reduce tomato production, this study aimed to determinate the effect of manganese (Mn) phosphite on the resistance of tomato plants to this disease by assessing the photosynthetic performance (gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence), the activities of defence enzymes and those related to the antioxidant metabolism as well as the concentrations of photosynthetic pigments, malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2−). The in vitro assays showed that S. sclerotiorum mycelial growth was inhibited by Mn phosphite in a dose‐response manner. The spray of Mn phosphite reduced white mold severity on the leaves of tomato plants. Additionally, there was a higher foliar Mn concentration for plants sprayed with Mn phosphite. The negative effects of S. sclerotiorum infection in the photosynthetic process were mitigated by Mn phosphite application as noticed by the net carbon assimilation rate, stomatal conductance to water vapour, transpiration rate, maximal photosystem II quantum yield values and concentration of photosynthetic pigments. The concentrations of MDA, H2O2 and O2‐ on inoculated leaves were lower upon Mn phosphite spray. In general, the activities of defence enzymes and those related to the antioxidant metabolism were higher for water‐sprayed plants inoculated with S. sclerotiorum in comparison to those inoculated and sprayed with Mn phosphite. Based on the present study results, the application of Mn phosphite may represent a feasible alternative for white mold management in tomato plants.
Brown spot, caused by Bipolaris oryzae, is one of the most important diseases of rice. The non‐host toxin α‐picolinic acid (PA) has great potential to be used to enhance plant resistance against pathogen infection. The present study investigated the effect of spraying PA [0 (control), 1, 3, and 5 mg/mL] on the photosynthetic performance of rice plants (cultivar Metica‐1) infected or not with B. oryzae. Moreover, whether the PA treatment, especially at the highest concentration, could affect brown spot development was also evaluated. The chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters such as variable‐to‐maximum chlorophyll a fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm), photochemical yield [Y(II)], yield for dissipation by down‐regulation [Y(NPQ)], the yield for non‐regulated dissipation [Y(NO)], and electron transport rate (ETR) as well as the concentration of photosynthetic pigments were determined. Based on the in vitro assay, PA inhibited mycelial growth of B. oryzae in a dose‐dependent manner and conidial germ tube length only decreased at 5 mg PA/mL. Conidia germination was not affected by the PA treatment. Necrotic lesions caused by PA were observed on leaves of non‐inoculated plants at 3 and 5 mg PA/mL. Symptoms of the brown spot were reduced on plants sprayed with 1 and 3 mg PA/mL compared to the control treatment. Brown spot lesions and those originating from PA toxicity overlapped for inoculated plants sprayed with 3 and 5 mg PA/mL. The photochemical performance of non‐inoculated plants was hampered by treatments with 3 and 5 mg PA/mL. Greater concentration of photosynthetic pigments and less impairment on the photosynthetic performance of inoculated plants sprayed with 1 mg PA/mL were noticed based on the values of Fv/Fm, Y(II), Y(NPQ), Y(NO), and ETR compared to inoculated plants non‐sprayed with PA. In conclusion, spraying rice plants with a low concentration of PA could decrease brown spot severity while preserving the photosynthetic capacity of the infected plants. The cellular damage generated by spraying the plants with the highest PA concentration did not favour the infection process of B. oryzae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.