No abstract

No abstract

Uterine serous papillary carcinoma (USPC) is a rare and highly malignant form of endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by early metastasis, chemoresistance, and high mortality rate. Little is known about USPC tumorigenesis even if recently a HER-2/neu role has been suggested in its development and progression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate HER-2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 12 USPC formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Moreover, we looked at the correlation between HER-2 protein expression and HER-2/neu gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), other than HER-2/neu messenger RNA expression by quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Finally, these results have been compared with commonly evaluated clinical features in EC patients, in order to define the potential prognostic value of HER-2/neu overexpression in USPCs. A high expression of HER-2 protein by IHC was noted in 2 of 12 patients (16.6%), and the same cases showed specific HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH. All the samples investigated displayed a perfect concordance between IHC and FISH data. Five (41.6%) of 12 tumors demonstrated polysomy of chromosome 17 and, focusing on the 2 USPCs that showed HER-2/neu overexpression, one of them (50%) was polysomic for chromosome 17. All the other USPC cases (58.4%) showed to be disomic for chromosome 17. Quantitative RT real-time PCR performed on complementary DNA obtained from all FFPE USPC samples showed a complete correlation with FISH and IHC data. Moreover, HER-2/neu overexpression was associated with a poorer overall survival and a very low relapse-free survival time, thus being considered a candidate marker of worse overall prognosis in USPC. The use of trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody directed against HER-2/neu, for the therapy of patients with HER-2/neu-positive USPCs should be further investigated in clinical trials.

No rationale (examination sensitivity/sensibility, cost-effectiveness, or patient's survival benefit) is available today for any particular follow-up protocol; follow-up procedures should probably be tailored according to different prognostic factors; only physical examination, including pelvic-rectal examination, showed some utility in detecting recurrence. In this uncertain setting, follow-up interval should be defined with the consideration of the patient's will.

No abstract