Structural chromosomal rearrangements result from different mechanisms of formation, usually related to certain genomic architectural features that may lead to genetic instability. Most of these rearrangements arise from recombination, repair, or replication mechanisms that occur after a double-strand break or the stalling/breakage of a replication fork. Here, we review the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements, highlighting their main features and differences. The most important mechanisms of constitutional chromosomal alterations are discussed, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS), and Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication (MMBIR). Their involvement in chromoanagenesis and in the formation of complex chromosomal rearrangements, inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, and ring chromosomes is also outlined. We reinforce the importance of high-resolution analysis to determine the DNA sequence at, and near, their breakpoints in order to infer the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements and to reveal how cells respond to DNA damage and repair broken ends.
Oculo‐auriculo‐vertebral spectrum (OAVS) is a developmental disorder characterized by anomalies mainly involving the structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches. The spectrum presents with heterogeneous clinical features and complex etiology with genetic factors not yet completely understood. To date, MYT1 is the most important gene unambiguously associated with the spectrum and with functional data confirmation. In this work, we aimed to identify new single nucleotide variants (SNVs) affecting MYT1 in a cohort of 73 Brazilian patients diagnosed with OAVS. In addition, we investigated copy number variations (CNVs) encompassing this gene or its cis‐regulatory elements and compared the frequency of these events in patients versus a cohort of 455 Brazilian control individuals. A new SNV, predicted as likely deleterious, was identified in five unrelated patients with OAVS. All five patients presented hearing impairment and orbital asymmetry suggesting an association with the variant. CNVs near MYT1, located in its neighboring topologically associating domain (TAD), were found to be enriched in patients when compared to controls, indicating a possible involvement of this region with OAVS pathogenicity. Our findings highlight the genetic complexity of the spectrum that seems to involve more than one variant type and inheritance patterns.
Langer-Giedion syndrome (LGS) is caused by a contiguous deletion at 8q23q24, characterized by exostoses, facial, ectodermal, and skeletal anomalies, and, occasionally, intellectual disability. LGS patients have been diagnosed clinically or by routine cytogenetic techniques, hampering the definition of an accurate genotype-phenotype correlation for the syndrome. We report two unrelated patients with 8q23q24 deletions, characterized by cytogenomic techniques, with one of them, to our knowledge, carrying the smallest deletion reported in classic LGS cases. We assessed the pathogenicity of the deletion of genes within the 8q23q24 region and reviewed other molecularly confirmed cases from the literature. Our findings suggest a 3.2-Mb critical region for a typical presentation of the syndrome, emphasizing the contribution of the <i>TRPS1</i>, <i>RAD21</i>, and <i>EXT1</i> genes’ haploinsufficiency, and facial dysmorphisms as well as bone anomalies as the most frequent features among patients with LGS. We also suggest a possible role for the <i>CSMD3</i> gene, whose deletion seems to contribute to central nervous system anomalies. Since studies performing such correlation for LGS patients are limited, our data contribute to improving the genotype-phenotype characterization for LGS patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.