No abstract

No abstract

Heterosexual anal intercourse is rarely discussed in the scientific literature. Review of the literature suggests the silence is linked to ethnocentric discomfort about it among researchers and health care providers, coupled with the misconception that anal sex is a homosexual male practice, not heterosexual. Review of surveys of sexual practices suggest that heterosexual anal intercourse is far more common than generally realized, more than 10% of American women and their male consorts engaging in the act with some regularity. Sexually transmitted disease (STD) data, especially where only the rectum is infected with gonorrhea or other STD agents, buttresses survey data. Considerably more heterosexuals engage in the act than do homosexual and bisexual men, not all of whom participate in anal coitus. Anal intercourse carries an AIDS risk for women greater than that for vaginal coitus, just as receptive anal intercourse carries a very high risk for males. Infection with the AIDS virus is increasingly documented in women engaging in anal coitus with infected males, in America, Europe, and Latin America. Women in Western countries are less likely to continue HIV infectivity chains than are males engaging in same-gender anal intercourse.

receptive intercourse had been carried out in the previous two years, needle sharing in the previous five years, and frequency of douching before anal inter¬ course).1 The results indicated signifi¬ cant independent associations between both syphilis (odds ratio = 2-64; F<-001) and race (odds ratio = 2-61; P = -05) and HIV infection. The interaction term for syphilis and race was not significant (P = -31). Thus, Mr Potterat's hypothe¬ sis that syphilis is associated with HIV infection is supported by these data, but other factors must also contribute to the differences in HIV infection rates between blacks and whites.

Through use of a new bacteriophage assay capable of detecting a single viral plaque-forming unit (PFU), viral leakage through multiple replicates of several types of latex condoms has been evaluated. Stocks were used that had been preserved from a previous large study in which viral leakage had been assessed preliminarily in several brands. In the present research, much larger numbers of replicates--on the order of magnitude of 100 condoms per brand--were used. Leakage was demonstrated in single production lots of each of seven brands of condoms. With one notable exception, percent leakage ranged from 0.9 to 22.8%; 100% of the specimens of one profoundly flawed brand leaked. All test condoms were subjected to conditions intended to model these prevailing during coitus. Because the condoms used in this study were aged, current stocks of two widely sold brands were tested for comparison. Of these, 11.8% of one brand leaked, 25.7% of the other. The relevance of the results, which gave a high, albeit physiologically appropriate, challenge to the test brands, is discussed--so too is the significance to condom users of results deriving from a leakage assay of exquisitely high sensitivity.