The mechanisms by which the p53 response is triggered following exposure to DNA-damaging agents have not yet been clearly elucidated. We and others have previously suggested that blockage of RNA polymerase II may be the trigger for induction of the p53 response following exposure to ultraviolet light. Here we report on the correlation between inhibition of mRNA synthesis and the induction of p53, p21 WAF1 and apoptosis in diploid human ®broblasts treated with either UV light, cisplatin or the RNA synthesis inhibitors actinomycin D, DRB, H7 and a-amanitin. Exposure to ionizing radiation or the proteasome inhibitor LLnL, however, induced p53 and p21 WAF1 without aecting mRNA synthesis. Importantly, induction of p53 by the RNA synthesis or proteasome inhibitors did not correlate with the induction of DNA strand breaks. Furthermore, cisplatin-induced accumulation of active p53 in repair-de®cient XP-A cells occurred despite the lack of DNA strand break induction. Our results suggest that the induction of the p53 response by certain toxic agents is not triggered by DNA strand breaks but rather, may be linked to inhibition of mRNA synthesis either directly by the poisoning of RNA polymerase II or indirectly by the induction of elongation-blocking DNA lesions.
Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of human malignancies characterized by deficiencies in the DNA damage repair proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 and preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in targeting ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-deficient tumours. Here, we show that mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cells deficient in both ATM and p53 are more sensitive to the PARP inhibitor olaparib than cells lacking ATM function alone. In ATM-deficient MCL cells, olaparib induced DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation and stabilization of p53 as well as expression of p53-responsive cell cycle checkpoint regulators, and inhibition of DNA-PK reduced the toxicity of olaparib in ATM-deficient MCL cells. Thus, both DNA-PK and p53 regulate the response of ATM-deficient MCL cells to olaparib. In addition, small molecule inhibition of both ATM and PARP was cytotoxic in normal human fibroblasts with disruption of p53, implying that the combination of ATM and PARP inhibitors may have utility in targeting p53-deficient malignancies.
UV light induces the expression of a wide variety of genes. At present, it is unclear how cells sense the extent of DNA damage and alter the expression of UV-induced genes appropriately. UV light induces DNA damage that blocks transcription, and the probability that a gene sustains transcription-blocking DNA damage is proportional to locus size and dose of UV light. Using colon carcinoma cells that express a temperature-sensitive variant of p53 and undergo p53-dependent apoptosis after UV irradiation, we found that the number of p53-induced genes identified by oligonucleotide microarray analysis decreased in a UV dose-dependent manner. This was associated with a statistically significant shift in the spectrum of p53-induced genes toward compact genes with fewer and smaller introns. Genes encoding proapoptotic proteins involved in the initiation of the mitochondrial apoptotic cascade were prominent among the compact p53 target genes, whereas genes encoding negative regulators of p53 and the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway were significantly larger. We propose that the shift in spectrum of UV-responsive gene expression caused by passive effects of UV lesions on transcription acts as a molecular dosimeter, ensuring the elimination of cells sustaining irreparable transcription-blocking DNA damage.DNA damage ͉ microarray ͉ p53 ͉ transcription ͉ stress responses
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.