Use of chemoprophylaxis and increasing amounts of blood products following orthotopic liver transplant was associated with increased mortality. A significant positive association was observed between blood product administration and VTE, while chemoprophylaxis use was not significantly associated with VTE. Larger prospective studies are necessary to further examine the significance of this finding.

Management of type 1 diabetes in patients who have insulin hypersensitivity is a clinical challenge and places patients at risk for recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Hypersensitivity reactions can be due to the patient's response to the insulin molecule itself or one of the injection's non-insulin components. It is therefore crucial for clinicians to quickly recognize the type of hypersensitivity reaction that is occurring and identify potentially immunogenic additives for the purpose of directing therapy as various insulin preparations have differing ingredients. We present the case of a 23-year-old diabetic female with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and autoimmune enteropathy who developed a type III hypersensitivity reaction to multiple formulations of subcutaneous insulin after years of use and the challenges of devising a long-term management strategy.

Background: Enoxaparin dosing recommendations for morbidly obese patients are lacking. Retrospective and observational studies reported goal anti-Xa levels with a median dose of 0.8 mg/kg using total body weight. Further studies are needed to determine if a more conservative dosing strategy is warranted. Objective: To determine if reduced dose enoxaparin was more effective than standard dose at achieving goal anti-Xa levels in morbidly obese patients. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2. Patients were randomized to standard (1 mg/kg) or reduced dose (0.8 mg/kg) enoxaparin every 12 hours. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an initial anti-Xa at goal (0.5-1.1 IU/mL). Results: A total of 62 patients were enrolled and randomized to 1 mg/kg (n = 32) or 0.8 mg/kg (n = 30), and 54 patients completed the study. The study did not meet accrual for 80% power. Goal anti-Xa levels were achieved in a similar proportion for the reduced-dose (n = 25/28) and standard dose arms (n = 20/26; 89.3% vs 76.9%; P = 0.29). Overall, 9 patients required dose adjustments, of which 6 were in the 1-mg/kg arm, and all were above goal. No documented bleeding or thrombotic events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: This was the first randomized, controlled trial of enoxaparin dosing in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Overall, 89% of patients had a goal anti-Xa when initiated on 0.8 mg/kg. Based on the results, reduced dose enoxaparin may be a reasonable dosing strategy in morbidly obese patients.