No abstract

Application of tangential skin displacement at the fingertip has been shown to be effective in communicating direction and has potential for several applications. We have developed a portable, fingertip-mounted tactile display capable of displacing and stretching the skin of the fingerpad, using a 7 mm hemispherical tactor. In vivo tests of fingerpad skin stiffness were performed to determine the forces required to effectively render stimuli. Other design parameters such as stimulus speed and displacement were derived from our earlier work. The tactile display is capable of rendering \pm 1 mm of displacement at arbitrary orientations within a plane and with rates of approximately 5 mm/s. Compliance and backlash in the device's drive train were characterized using external measurements, and were compensated for in software to reduce the impact on device hysteresis.

A variety of tasks could benefit from the availability of direction cues that do not rely on vision or sound. The application of tangential skin displacement at the fingertip has been found to be a reliable means of communicating direction and has potential to be rendered by a compact device. Our lab has conducted experiments exploring the use of this type of tactile stimulus to communicate direction. Each subject pressed his/her right index fingertip against a 7 mm rounded rubber cylinder that moved at constant speed, applying shear force to deform the skin of the fingerpad. A range of displacements (0.05-1 mm) and speeds (0.5-4 mm/s) were tested. Subjects were asked to respond with the direction of the skin stretch, choosing from four directions, each separated by 90 degrees. Direction detection accuracy was found to depend upon both the speed and total displacement of the stimulus, with higher speeds and larger displacements resulting in greater accuracy. Accuracy rates greater than 95 percent were observed with as little as 0.2 mm of tangential displacement and at speeds as slow as 1 mm/s. Results were analyzed for direction dependence and temporal trends. Subjects responded most accurately to stimuli in the proximal and distal directions, and least accurately to stimuli in the ulnar direction. Subject performance decreased slightly with prolonged testing but there was no statistically significant learning trend. A second experiment was conducted to evaluate priming effects and the benefit of repeated stimuli. It was found that repeated stimuli do not improve direction communication, but subject responses were found to have a priming effect on future performance. This preliminary information will inform the design and use of a tactile display suitable for use in hand-held electronics.

To address the limited dexterous workspace of the human hand, we have developed the Active Handrest. This device assists in precision manipulation tasks by extending a user’s dexterous workspace while providing ergonomic support for reduced fatigue. People use handrests to complete dexterous activities as routine as providing a signature. However, the dexterous workspace of the statically supported hand is somewhat limited. By providing consistent support over large workspaces the Active Handrest could be useful for performing precision tasks, such as surgery, upper limb rehabilitation, and machining. Our prototype Active Handrest is a planar, human–machine interface that provides support for the user’s wrist and arm while allowing the user to retain complete control over a grasped tool or manipulated device. The Active Handrest uses force input from the user’s hand, position input from a grasped tool, or a combination of these inputs. The device’s controller then converts the input(s) into handrest motions. In this paper we describe our novel device prototype and establish a baseline for its performance. Preliminary experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of control input, velocity limits, and user experience. Subsequent experiments compared the Active Handrest to various other support conditions. Use of the Active Handrest was found to significantly reduce task error and provided better speed-accuracy performance than the other tested support methods.

Tactile feedback could replace or augment visual and auditory communication in a range of important applications. This paper advances the field of tactile communication by presenting performance data on a variety of tactors and a finger restraint that is suitable for use in portable devices. Tactors, the contact elements between the device and the skin, and finger restraints were evaluated using a tangential skin displacement direction identification task. We tested tactors of three sizes and two different textures. Rough textured tactors improved communication accuracy compared to smooth tactors, but tactor size did not have a statistically significant effect. Aperture-based restraints of three sizes were evaluated on both the index finger and the thumb. The aperture-based restraint was effective when used on both the index finger and the thumb, with performances on par with our previously tested thimble-based restraint. Participants performed better with larger apertures than with smaller apertures, but there was no interaction between aperture size and finger size, meaning that the same aperture could be used with a range of finger sizes. Subjects' perceptual acuity varied with stimulus direction. We discuss the effects of contact force, finger size, and differences in perceptual acuity between the index finger and thumb.