Introduction: the port and its reconceptualizationsThe trajectory of the theoretical discourse on the modern seaport has not been a linear one. Technological breakthroughs in cargo handling and concomitant advances in naval engineering which gave rise to containerization and bulk shipping engendered a number of scholarly deliberations as to how the port could be conceptualized. The seminal works by Bird (1963) and Taaffe et al (1963) spawned a large body of research into understanding the port in relation to spatial change (Hayuth, 1987;Hilling and Hoyle, 1984;Rimmer, 1967). A second wave of reconceptualization emerged when transport geographers began to hypothesize about how this historically self-standing pivotal space was being assimilated within broader corporate agendas. The port had become a mere`pawn in the game' of global corporate interests and intermodal networks (Slack, 1993). Port reforms worldwide brought to the fore questions about portsöfor whom and by whom? Governance then became a trendy lens by which to approach the port not as a space, but as a community. The most recent theoretical departure has been expressed by Robinson (2002), who argues for nothing less than a paradigm shift in port studies. A new paradigm would seek to ground the port within themes of logistics and value-adding chains. Robinson's (2002, page 245) rationale is a strong one, which deserves further attention:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.