A provider-directed intervention with feedback on individual and firm-specific screening rates significantly increased both recommendations and colorectal cancer screening completion rates among veterans.
Allosteric interactions: Metal(II) cyclens inhibit Ras–effector interactions by stabilizing a weak effector‐binding state of Ras, state 1(T), and binding directly in the active site. The novel state (1T) inhibitor Zn2+–BPA (BPA=bis(2‐picolyl)amine) binds outside the nucleotide binding pocket but nevertheless allosterically stabilizes state 1(T) and thus inhibits the Ras–Raf interaction.
The risk of MTHF in hypogonadal elderly men was investigated with a case-control model. Cases and controls were selected from males age 65 years and older residing in the 120-bed McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center Nursing Home Care Unit over a 5-day interval. Historical data and serum free testosterone (fTe) were available on 17 subjects with MTHF and 61 controls. When groups were compared for differences in age, race, alcohol abuse, cigarette abuse, and diseases or drugs that may be associated with MTHF, only race was significantly different. Although 25.6% of residents were black, 100% of MTHF subjects were white (P = 0.004). Hypogonadism was defined as a random fTe less than 9 pg/mL (normal 9 to 46 pg/mL) and was found in 21 subjects (26.9%). Of cases with a MTHF, 58.8% were hypogonadal compared with only 18.0% of controls. Utilizing logistic regression, a highly significant association was found between hypogonadism and MTHF (P = 0.008), and using the odds ratio, subjects with hypogonadism were 6.5 times more likely to have a MTHF (95% CI 2.0 to 20.6). To adjust for race, the odds ratio was repeated excluding black subjects, and the results remained highly significant (4.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 16.2). We conclude that hypogonadal elderly white men may be at increased risk for MTHF.
MassachusettsWith the recent Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) publication of their metastatic prostate cancer clinical trial results, which concluded that orchiectomy and utamide as maximal androgen blockade (MAB) therapy vs orchiectomy alone does not signi®cantly improve survival (NCI 0105), and the 1989 publication from the same cooperative group indicating a 24% improvement in survival for MAB therapy with leuprolide and¯utamide versus leuprolide alone (NCI 0036), clinicians may well be undecided about the likelihood of clinical bene®ts with¯utamide in combination with medical or surgical castration. To better characterize this important therapeutic decision, we assessed the survival bene®t of MAB therapy with¯utamide through a meta-analysis of up-to-date information from studies reportedaconducted from 1989 through 1998.All peer-reviewed published randomized controlled trials comparing treatment with¯utamide plus either lutenizing hormone releasing hormone (LhRH) agonists or orchiectomy as MAB treatment with LhRH or orchiectomy alone were included. The primary objective of the study was to form a combined estimate and con®dence interval for the hazard ratio (as measured by the relative risk (RR) of survival in a comparison of castration vs MAB) summarizing the effect of utamide treatment on overall survival. Directly extracted estimates of the log hazard ratio were used if available (1 study); if not, either an estimate of the RR based on a reported P-value from a log rank test (7 studies) or a discrete proportional hazards approximation based on reconstructed annual life tables for the treatment arms (1 study) were used.Nine studies with 4128 patients with advanced prostate cancer were included in these analyses. Pooled estimates demonstrated a 10% improvement in overall survival with¯utamide as MAB therapy (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% Con®dence Interval 0.79, 1.00).The currently available updated evidence from randomized trials shows a 10% bene®t in overall survival with¯utamide as MAB therapy in comparison to conventional castration, almost identical to the estimate reported in the recently published Southwest Oncology Group Study (NCI 0105).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.