A real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was developed to rapidly detect the severe acute respiratory syndrome–associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). The assay, based on multiple primer and probe sets located in different regions of the SARS-CoV genome, could discriminate SARS-CoV from other human and animal coronaviruses with a potential detection limit of <10 genomic copies per reaction. The real-time RT-PCR assay was more sensitive than a conventional RT-PCR assay or culture isolation and proved suitable to detect SARS-CoV in clinical specimens. Application of this assay will aid in diagnosing SARS-CoV infection.
Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are important contributors to respiratory disease, but their healthcare burden remains unclear, primarily because of the lack of sensitive, accurate, and convenient means of determining their causal role. To address this, we developed and clinically validated the sensitivity and specificity of a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay targeting the viral 5 noncoding region defined by sequences obtained from all 100 currently recognized HRV prototype strains and 85 recently circulating field isolates. The assay successfully amplified all HRVs tested and could reproducibly detect 50 HRV RNA transcript copies, with a dynamic range of over 7 logs. In contrast, a quantified RNA transcript of human enterovirus 68 (HEV68) that showed the greatest sequence homology to the HRV primers and probe set was not detected below a concentration of 5 ؋ 10 5 copies per reaction. Nucleic acid extracts of 111 coded respiratory specimens that were culture positive for HRV or HEV were tested with the HRV real-time RT-PCR assay and by two independent laboratories that used different in-house HRV/HEV RT-PCR assays. Eighty-seven HRVculture-positive specimens were correctly identified by the real-time RT-PCR assay, and 4 of the 24 HEVpositive samples were positive for HRV. HRV-specific sequences subsequently were identified in these four specimens, suggesting HRV/HEV coinfection in these patients. The assay was successfully applied in an investigation of a coincidental outbreak of HRV respiratory illness among laboratory staff.
This is the first molecular subtyping system that distinguishes among clinical isolates of T. pallidum.
Allelic frequencies and relationships for one dimorphic locus and three unlinked polymorphic loci have been determined for 114 unrelated isolates of Candida albicans, including 14 laboratory reference strains and 50 strains from each of two geographic regions. Although there was no indication of geographical partitioning, there were significant correlations for specific allelic pairs among loci and little evidence that any alleles were in HardyWeinberg equilibrium. This gives additional support for the concept that the primary mode of genetic inheritance in this species is clonal, with other intracellular genetic events playing a lesser role in the creation of genomic diversity. Through inference of this and other known attributes of closely related Candida species, such as sequence analysis of I S 1 and the ITS2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) region of the rDNA cistron, the deduced phylogeny suggests an evolutionarily recent origin for many frequently isolated strains. This finding will be of interest in the context of understanding pathogenicity and drug resistance in this human commensal yeast.
Chlamydia pneumoniae is an important respiratory pathogen recently associated with atherosclerosis and several other chronic diseases. Detection of C. pneumoniae is inconsistent, and standardized PCR assays are needed. Two real-time PCR assays specific for C. pneumoniae were developed by using the fluorescent dyelabeled TaqMan probe-based system. Oligonucleotide primers and probes were designed to target two variable domains of the ompA gene, VD2 and VD4. The limit of detection for each of the two PCR assays was 0.001 inclusion-forming unit. Thirty-nine C. pneumoniae isolates obtained from widely distributed geographical areas were amplified by the VD2 and VD4 assays, producing the expected 108-and 125-bp amplification products, respectively. None of the C. trachomatis serovars, C. psittaci strains, other organisms, or human DNAs tested were amplified. The amplification results of the newly developed assays were compared to the results of culturing and two nested PCR assays, targeting the 16S rRNA and ompA genes. The assays were compared by testing C. pneumoniae purified elementary bodies, animal tissues, 228 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) specimens, and 179 oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens obtained from ischemic stroke patients or matched controls. The real-time VD4 assay and one nested PCR each detected C. pneumoniae in a single, but different, PBMC specimen. Eleven of 179 OP specimens (6.1%) showed evidence of the presence of C. pneumoniae in one or more tests. The real-time VD4 assay detected the most positive results of the five assays. We believe that this real-time PCR assay offers advantages over nested PCR assays and may improve the detection of C. pneumoniae in clinical specimens.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers derived from a variable region of the 16S rRNA gene sequence were used to amplify DNA specifically from Ehrlichia chaffeensis (the recently proposed name for the etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis). The 389-bp product defined by the specific primers was not detected when DNA samples from any of the other recognized species of Ehrlichia were used as amplification templates. When the PCR was applied to five suitable blood specimens obtained from patients subsequently shown to be serologically positive for E. chaffeensis, all five were positive. The same technique was applied to a total of six control blood specimens, three from febrile patients who had no serologic evidence of infection with Ehrlichia or Rickettsia species and three from patients diagnosed with Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and all six were negative. A chemiluminescent, group-specific oligonucleotide probe was shown to hybridize only with the PCR products obtained upon amplification of the five blood specimens from patients serologically diagnosed as having human ehrlichiosis. The results indicate that PCR, coupled with a nonisotopic method of confirming the identity of the PCR product, is a highly specific and efficient method of detecting the agent of human ehrlichiosis in blood. The results also suggest that E. chaffeensis is the sole etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis in the United States. The technique was also applied to four ticks that were positive by direct immunofluorescence for Ehrlichia species, and one tick was PCR positive, indicating that E. chaffeensis DNA can be detected in ticks harboring this organism, although the sensitivity may be low.
Specific identification of Entamoeba spp. in clinical specimens is an important confirmatory diagnostic step in the management of patients who may be infected with Entamoeba histolytica, the species that causes clinical amebiasis. Distinct real-time PCR protocols have recently been published for identification of E. histolytica and differentiation from the morphologically identical nonpathogenic Entamoeba dispar. In this study, we compared three E. histolytica real-time PCR techniques published by December 2004. The limits of detection and efficiency of each real-time PCR assay were determined using DNA extracted from stool samples spiked with serially diluted cultured E. histolytica trophozoites. The ability of each assay to correctly distinguish E. histolytica from E. dispar was evaluated with DNA extracted from patients' stools and liver aspirates submitted for confirmatory diagnosis. Real-time PCR allowed quantitative analysis of the spiked stool samples, but major differences in detection limits and assay performance were observed among the evaluated tests. These results illustrate the usefulness of comparative evaluations of diagnostic assays.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.