➢ Implementation of multimodal pain management regimens after total knee arthroplasty has increased patient satisfaction, decreased pain scores, and facilitated faster recovery.➢ A variety of oral and intravenous analgesics, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, acetaminophen, and opioids, can be employed preoperatively and postoperatively.➢ Neuraxial anesthesia, peripheral nerve blocks, and periarticular injections are effective pain modulators that should be implemented in concert with the anesthesia teams.➢ There is no consensus on the optimal multimodal pain regimen, and substantial variability exists between institutions and providers.➢ The goals of minimizing pain and improving functional recovery in the postoperative period must be considered in light of evidence-based practice as well as the risk profile of the proposed analgesic treatment.
Purpose of review Office-based anesthesia (OBA) is rapidly growing across the world. Availability of less invasive interventions has facilitated the opportunity of offering new procedures in office-based settings to patient populations that would not have been considered in the past. This article provides a practical approach to discuss and analyze newest literature supporting different practices in the field of OBA. In addition, an update of the most recent guidelines and practice management directives is included. Recent findings Selected procedures may be performed in the office-based scenario with exceedingly low complication rates, when the right patient population is selected, and adequate safety protocols are followed. Current regulations are focused on reducing surgical risk through the implementation of patient safety protocols and practice standardization. Strategies include cognitive aids for emergencies, safety checklists, facility accreditation standards among other. Summary New evidence exists supporting procedures in the office-based scenario in areas such as plastic and cosmetic surgery, dental and oral surgery, ophthalmology, endovascular procedures and otolaryngology. Different systematic approaches have been developed (guidelines and position statements) to promote standardization of safe practices through emergency protocols, safety checklists, medication management and surgical risk reduction. New regulations and accreditation measures have been developed to homogenize practice and promote high safety standards.
As of mid-October 2014, the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa has affected approximately 10,000 patients, approached a 50% mortality rate, and crossed political and geographic borders without precedent. The disease has spread throughout Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone. Isolated cases have arrived in urban centers in Europe and North America. The exponential growth, currently unabated, highlights the urgent need for effective and immediate management protocols for the various health care subspecialties that may care for Ebola virus disease patients. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to identify key areas of anesthetic care affected by this disease. The serious potential for "high-risk exposure" and "direct contact" (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of anesthesiologists caring for Ebola patients prompted this urgent investigation. A search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, MeSH, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. Key words included "anesthesia" and/or "ebola" combined with "surgery," "intubation," "laryngoscopy," "bronchoscopy," "stethoscope," "ventilation," "ventilator," "phlebotomy," "venous cannulation," "operating room," "personal protection," "equipment," "aerosol," "respiratory failure," or "needle stick." No language or date limits were applied. We also included secondary-source data from government organizations and scientific societies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Surgeons. Articles were reviewed for primary-source data related to inpatient management of Ebola cases as well as evidence-based management guidelines and protocols for the care of Ebola patients in the operative room, infection control, and health care worker personal protection. Two hundred thirty-six articles were identified using the aforementioned terminology in the scientific database search engines. Twenty articles met search criteria for information related to inpatient Ebola virus disease management or animal virology studies as primary or secondary sources. In addition, 9 articles met search criteria as tertiary sources, representing published guidelines. The recommendations developed in this article are based on these 29 source documents. Anesthesia-specific literature regarding the care of Ebola patients is very limited. Secondary-source guidelines and policies represent the majority of available information. Data from controlled animal experiments and tuberculosis patient research provide some evidence for the existing recommendations and identify future guideline considerations.
There has been an exponential increase in plastic surgery cases over the last 20 years, surging from 2.8 million to 17.5 million cases per year. Seventy-two percent of these cases are being performed in the office-based or ambulatory setting. There are certain advantages to performing aesthetic procedures in the office, but several widely publicized fatalities and malpractice claims has put the spotlight on patient safety and the lack of uniform regulation of office-based practices. While 33 states currently have legislation for office-based surgery and anesthesia, 17 states have no mandate to report patient deaths or adverse outcomes. The literature on office-base surgery and anesthesia has demonstrated significant improvements in patient safety over the last 20 years. In the following review of the proceedings from the PRS Korea 2018 meeting, we discuss several key concepts regarding safe anesthesia for officebased cosmetic surgery. These include the safe delivery of oxygen, appropriate local anesthetic usage and the avoidance of local anesthetic toxicity, the implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols, multimodal analgesic techniques with less reliance on narcotic pain medications, the use of surgical safety checklists, and incorporating “the patient” into the surgical decision-making process through decision aids.
worsening oxygenation owing to pleural effusion and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome and may receive a new course of antibiotics for suspected intra-abdominal infection. Such a patient who does not suffer from VAP fulfills all of the criteria for VAC and even for IVAC. In summary, the main conclusions arising from this study are (1) that preventing VAP is possible, although it will not improve overall outcomes and (2) that VAC cannot be used as a surrogate for VAP.A pandemic in 2014 brought the Ebola virus screaming back into the spotlight of the world stage. This article details the history, etiology, epidemiology, and pathophysiology of this dangerous disease, as well as limited known coverage of Ebola patient management.During the course of the past 38 years, the Ebola virus has sparked a number of epidemics. Characteristics of this type of disease include fever and bleeding diathesis. The first documented case believed to be tied to the Ebola virus is believed to have occurred in 1967. The disease is transmitted when secretions from an infected patient come in contact with mucosa, conjunctiva, or percutaneous injury.As emphasized in the piece, the Ebola virus spreads easily and is highly lethal. The emphasis is on symptom management, not treatment. Rehydration with an electrolyte solution is the most common form of management. Studies of nonhuman primates with the Ebola virus indicate that the greater the viral exposure, the shorter the incubation period and therefore the greater likelihood of death. Survival is possible, however. As the article points out, several promising therapies for Ebola are being developed and on the horizon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.