Background: The HEART Pathway is an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) designed to identify low-risk Emergency Department (ED) patients with chest pain for early discharge without stress testing or angiography. The objective of this study was to determine whether implementation of the HEART Pathway is safe (30 day death and myocardial infarction rate <1% in low-risk patients) and effective (reduces 30 day hospitalizations) in ED patients with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A prospective pre/post study was conducted at three US sites among 8,474 adult ED patients with possible ACS. Patients included were ≥21 years old, investigated for possible ACS, and had no evidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography. Accrual occurred for 12 months before and after HEART Pathway implementation from November 2013- January 2016. The HEART Pathway ADP was integrated into each site’s electronic health record as an interactive clinical decision support tool. Following ADP integration, ED providers prospectively utilized the HEART Pathway to identify patients with possible ACS as low-risk (appropriate for early discharge without stress testing or angiography) or non-low-risk (appropriate for further in-hospital evaluation). The primary safety and effectiveness outcomes, death and myocardial infarction (MI) and hospitalization rates at 30 days, were determined from health records, insurance claims, and death index data. Results: Pre- and post-implementation cohorts included 3713 and 4761 patients, respectively. The HEART Pathway identified 30.7% as low-risk; 0.4% of these patients experienced death or MI within 30 days. Hospitalization at 30 days was reduced by 6% in the post- vs pre-implementation cohort (55.6% vs 61.6%; aOR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.71–0.87). During the index visit more MIs were detected in the post-implementation cohort (6.6% vs 5.7%; aOR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.12–1.65). Rates of death or MI during follow-up were similar (1.1% vs 1.3%; aOR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.58–1.33). Conclusions: HEART Pathway implementation was associated with decreased hospitalizations, increased identification of index visit MIs, and a very low death and MI rate among low-risk patients. These findings support use of the HEART Pathway to identify low-risk patients that can be safely discharged without stress testing or angiography. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02056964

Electronic health records (EHRs) present a wealth of data that are vital for improving patient-centered outcomes, although the data can present significant statistical challenges. In particular, EHR data contains substantial missing information that if left unaddressed could reduce the validity of conclusions drawn. Properly addressing the missing data issue in EHR data is complicated by the fact that it is sometimes difficult to differentiate between missing data and a negative value. For example, a patient without a documented history of heart failure may truly not have disease or the clinician may have simply not documented the condition. Approaches for reducing missing data in EHR systems come from multiple angles, including: increasing structured data documentation, reducing data input errors, and utilization of text parsing / natural language processing. This paper focuses on the analytical approaches for handling missing data, primarily multiple imputation. The broad range of variables available in typical EHR systems provide a wealth of information for mitigating potential biases caused by missing data. The probability of missing data may be linked to disease severity and healthcare utilization since unhealthier patients are more likely to have comorbidities and each interaction with the health care system provides an opportunity for documentation. Therefore, any imputation routine should include predictor variables that assess overall health status (e.g. Charlson Comorbidity Index) and healthcare utilization (e.g. number of encounters) even when these comorbidities and patient encounters are unrelated to the disease of interest. Linking the EHR data with other sources of information (e.g. National Death Index and census data) can also provide less biased variables for imputation. Additional methodological research with EHR data and improved epidemiological training of clinical investigators is warranted.

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of obesity and its related comorbidities among patients being actively managed at a US academic medical centre, and to examine the frequency of a formal diagnosis of obesity, via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) documentation among patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2.DesignThe electronic health record system at Cleveland Clinic was used to create a cross-sectional summary of actively managed patients meeting minimum primary care physician visit frequency requirements. Eligible patients were stratified by BMI categories, based on most recent weight and median of all recorded heights obtained on or before the index date of 1July 2015. Relationships between patient characteristics and BMI categories were tested.SettingA large US integrated health system.ResultsA total of 324 199 active patients with a recorded BMI were identified. There were 121 287 (37.4%) patients found to be overweight (BMI ≥25 and <29.9), 75 199 (23.2%) had BMI 30–34.9, 34 152 (10.5%) had BMI 35–39.9 and 25 137 (7.8%) had BMI ≥40. There was a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes, pre-diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease (P value<0.0001) within higher BMI compared with lower BMI categories. In patients with a BMI >30 (n=134 488), only 48% (64 056) had documentation of an obesity ICD-9 code. In those patients with a BMI >40, only 75% had an obesity ICD-9 code.ConclusionsThis cross-sectional summary from a large US integrated health system found that three out of every four patients had overweight or obesity based on BMI. Patients within higher BMI categories had a higher prevalence of comorbidities. Less than half of patients who were identified as having obesity according to BMI received a formal diagnosis via ICD-9 documentation. The disease of obesity is very prevalent yet underdiagnosed in our clinics. The under diagnosing of obesity may serve as an important barrier to treatment initiation.

Background The accumulation of deficits model for frailty has been used to develop an electronic health record (EHR) frailty index (eFI) that has been incorporated into British guidelines for frailty management. However, there have been limited applications of EHR-based approaches in the United States. Methods We constructed an adapted eFI for patients in our Medicare Accountable Care Organization (ACO, N = 12,798) using encounter, diagnosis code, laboratory, medication, and Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) data from the EHR. We examined the association of the eFI with mortality, health care utilization, and injurious falls. Results The overall cohort was 55.7% female, 85.7% white, with a mean age of 74.9 (SD = 7.3) years. In the prior 2 years, 32.1% had AWV data. The eFI could be calculated for 9,013 (70.4%) ACO patients. Of these, 46.5% were classified as prefrail (0.10 < eFI ≤ 0.21) and 40.1% frail (eFI > 0.21). Accounting for age, comorbidity, and prior health care utilization, the eFI independently predicted all-cause mortality, inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and injurious falls (all p < .001). Having at least one functional deficit captured from the AWV was independently associated with an increased risk of hospitalizations and injurious falls, controlling for other components of the eFI. Conclusions Construction of an eFI from the EHR, within the context of a managed care population, is feasible and can help to identify vulnerable older adults. Future work is needed to integrate the eFI with claims-based approaches and test whether it can be used to effectively target interventions tailored to the health needs of frail patients.