Deformational Plagiocephaly (DP) is a multi-planar deformity of the cranium occurring either pre-or postnatally in infants. In the last decade, the incidence of DP has increased substantially due to a number of factors, including supine sleeping positioning to reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and the use of child carriers that increase supine positioning. Clinical questions persist about which children should be treated for DP and how to intervene, questions that are difficult to answer without accurate documentation of three-dimensional (3-D) head shape. This study explored a method for quantifying head shape and used that method to evaluate the success of orthotic treatment. Two hundred twenty-four infants who were diagnosed with DP received either a cranial remolding orthosis or a repositioning program with no orthotic intervention. Data from 25 head shape variables were collected using a noninvasive laser shape digitizer. Only variables attributable to growth showed significant differences in the control population, while the treatment population showed significant differences in pre-and post-treatment values for all variables. The study identified four variables as particularly important in assessing the head shape of infants with plagiocephaly: the cranial vault asymmetry index, radial symmetry index, posterior symmetry ratio, and overall symmetry ratio. Ninety-six percent or more of subjects in the treatment group showed improvement in each variable. These data document the utility of a 3-D scanning device and the effectiveness of treatment with a cranial remolding orthosis.

Studies have attempted to categorize infant cranial asymmetry in a variety of ways using both observational and quantitative techniques, but none have created a clinical tool that can serve as a treatment guide based on clinical outcomes. In 2006, a research team from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta published the results of a prospective analysis of 224 patients with cranial asymmetries and their treatment outcomes. As a continuation of the previous work, the researchers have identified a plagiocephaly severity scale based on those outcomes to assist medical professionals who treat patients with cranial abnormalities. Our hypothesis is to validate the proposed severity scale that categorizes the clinical presentation and severity of plagiocephaly.Of the 224 patients enrolled, 207 patients were placed in an experimental group and 17 patients who refused treatment were placed in a control group. Digital head shape data were collected. Cross-correlation matrices were computed across variables and regression models resulted in the identification of 5 meaningful variables. A 5-level clinical classification scale was created. Five 1 × 5 analyses of variance were computed to compare each classification level.Four of the 5 analyses of variance identified significant overall effects for classification. A model was developed from the empirical data and the model was tested for accuracy, resulting in 12.1% overall error. The model was validated for both experimental and control groups.The results show that the severity scale is a meaningful outcome-based scale that assists clinicians in developing a treatment plan for treating plagiocephaly. The scale has been validated across a large heterogeneous study sample.

The traditional treatment protocol for young children with congenital or acquired amputations at or proximal to the knee prescribes a prosthesis without a working knee joint, based in part on the assumption that a child learning to walk cannot properly utilize a passively flexing prosthetic knee component. An alternative to this Traditional Knee (TK) protocol is an "Early Knee" (EK) protocol, which prescribes an articulating prosthetic knee in the child's first prosthesis, during development of crawling and transitioning into and out of upright positions. To date, no study has compared samples of children with limb loss at or proximal to the knee using TK and EK protocols. The purpose of this multi-site study was to examine kinematic outcomes during walking in separate groups of young children in an EK and a TK prosthesis protocol, along with a population of children without lower limb amputations. Eighteen children aged 12 months to five years were recruited for this study at two clinical sites, six in each of the three groups. Children in the two prosthesis groups had unilateral limb loss and had been treated either at one site with the TK protocol or at another with the EK protocol. Children in the EK group achieved swing phase prosthetic knee flexion averaging 59.8±8.4 degrees. Children wearing prosthetic limbs walked slower than age-matched peers. In most instances, walking speed and step length increased with age in the EK group, similar to the control group. However, this trend was not observed in the TK group. Clearance adaptations were present in both limb loss groups. Observed adaptations were twice as prevalent in the TK group versus the EK group; however, the groups differed in age and etiology. Children with limb loss provided with an articulating knee component in their first prosthesis incorporated knee flexion during swing phase and showed fewer gait adaptations than children in the TK protocol.

No abstract