Transoral robotic surgery provides an emerging alternative for selected primary and salvage head and neck tumors with low morbidity and acceptable functional outcomes. Patients with advanced T stage, laryngeal or oropharyngeal site, and preoperative enterogastric feeding may be at increased risk of enterogastric feeding and poor swallowing outcomes.

Implementation of pretreatment swallowing education and exercise may improve dysphagia-specific QOL in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation and/or chemoradiation therapy.

Purpose: Though various targets have been proposed and evaluated, no agent has yet been investigated in a clinical setting for head and neck cancer. The present study aimed to compare two fluorescently labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies for detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Procedures: Antigen specificities and in vitro imaging of the fluorescently labeled anti-EGFR antibodies were performed. Next, immunodeficient mice (n=22) bearing HNSCC (OSC-19 and SCC-1) tongue tumors received systemic injections of cetuximab-IRDye800CW, panitumumab-IRDye800CW, or IgG-IRDye800CW (a nonspecific control). Tumors were imaged and resected using two near-infrared imaging systems, SPY and Pearl. Fluorescent lymph nodes were also identified, and all resected tissues were sent for pathology. Results: Panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW had specific and high affinity binding for EGFR (KD=0.12 and 0.31 nM, respectively). Panitumumab-IRDye800CW demonstrated a 2-fold increase in fluorescence intensity compared to cetuximab-IRDye800CW in vitro. In vivo, both fluorescently labeled antibodies produced higher tumor-to-background ratios compared to IgG-IRDye800CW. However, there was no significant difference between the two in either cell line or imaging modality (OSC-19: p=0.08 SPY, p=0.48 Pearl; SCC-1: p=0.77 SPY, p=0.59 Pearl; paired t tests). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the two fluorescently labeled anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in murine models of HNSCC. Both cetuximab and panitumumab can be considered suitable targeting agents for fluorescent intraoperative detection of HNSCC.

Fluorescent immunoguided neoplasm detection may be used as a diagnostic tool and to guide surgical therapy by providing real-time imaging information about the extent of disease or the presence of residual disease.

Physicians and surgeons rely on subtle tissue changes to detect the extent of tumors and the presence of residual disease in the clinical setting. The development of a cancer-specific fluorescent contrast agent has the potential to provide real-time tumor imaging in the clinic or operating room. Because epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly overexpressed on the surface of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), we sought to determine if fluorescently labeled anti-EGFR antibody could be used to image HNSCC xenografts in vivo. Cetuximab or control isotype-matched IgG1 was conjugated with the Cy5.5 fluorochrome and systemically injected into mice bearing human split thickness skin grafts, tumor cell line xenografts, transplanted human tumor xenografts, or mouse mesothelioma tumors. Xenografts were imaged by time-domain fluorescence imaging or fluorescence stereomicroscopy. Both imaging modalities detected specific uptake of cetuximab-Cy5.5 in HNSCC xenografts with significantly higher fluorescence levels relative to control IgG1-Cy5.5. Tumor xenograft fluorescence was higher compared with background (before injection), human split thickness skin grafts, or mouse mesothelioma tumors at 24, 48, and 72 h. Fluorescence was detected in multiple HNSCC tumor cell lines with variable EGFR expression levels. Mock resections of flank tumors using fluorescence stereomicroscopy showed that small (2 mm) specimens could be detected in the surgical wound bed. These results show the feasibility of using fluorescently labeled anti-EGFR antibody to detect human tumors in the surgical setting. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(4):1230 -8]

There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative or perioperative outcomes between the PercTrachs performed in high-risk versus low-risk patients. PercTrachs may be performed safely even in high-risk patients such as those with morbid obesity and coagulopathy.

No abstract

No abstract