ObjectivesTo review the safety and efficacy of surgical management for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks of the anterior and lateral skull base.Data SourcesA systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE.Review MethodsSearch terms included spontaneous, CSF, cerebrospinal fluid, endoscopic, middle fossa, transmastoid, leak, rhinorrhea. Independent extraction of articles by 3 authors.ResultsPatients with spontaneous CSF leaks are often obese (average BMI of 38 kg/m2) and female (72%). Many patients also have obstructive sleep apnea (∼45%) and many have elevated intracranial pressure when measured by lumbar puncture. In addition to thinning of the skull base, radiographic studies also demonstrate cortical bone thinning. Endoscopic surgical repair of anterior skull base leaks and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach for repair of lateral skull base leaks are safe and effective with an average short‐term failure rate of 9% and 6.5%, respectively. Long‐term failure rates are low. One randomized trial failed to show improved success of anterior leak repairs with the use of a lumbar drain (LD) (95% with vs. 92% without; P = 0.2). In a large retrospective cohort of MCF lateral skull base repairs, perioperative LD use was not necessary in >94% of patients.ConclusionsSpontaneous CSF leaks are associated with female gender, obesity, increased intracranial hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Endoscopic repair of anterior skull base leaks and MCF or transmastoid approaches for lateral skull base leaks have a high success rate of repair. In most cases, intraoperative placement of lumbar drain did not appear to result in improved success rates for either anterior or lateral skull base leaks.Level of Evidence2a, Systematic Review.

Background:The objective of this work was to be er understand variations in perioperative management in endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery (EESBS) and to identify trends in management based upon the practice pa erns of North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) members. Methods:A 29-question survey evaluating perioperative EESBS management was sent to all NASBS members. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Subgroup analysis was performed based on participant demographics. A Bonferroni correction was performed and a p value <0.01 was considered statistically significant for subgroup analysis.Results: Of 651 invitees, 116 responded (17.8%). Participants were primarily from the United States (81.0%), and practiced in academic centers (83.6%). The majority were neurosurgeons (55.2%) or rhinologists (27.6%). Most surgeons (83.6%) advocated use of preoperative intravenous antibiotics (96.6%) and image guidance in all cases (83.6%). Lumbar drains were not recommended for cases in which an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was not anticipated (94.8%). Nasoseptal flaps (NSFs) were not recommended in cases without intraoperative CSF leak (84.5%), but were recommended in cases of high-flow intraoperative CSF leak (97.4%). While postoperative restrictions were highly variable, most providers recommended CSF leak precautions (89.7%), flying restrictions (94.0%), and driving restrictions (95.6%) regardless of intraoperative CSF leak status. Most experts also recommended that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) be avoided for at least 2 weeks when an intraoperative CSF leak is encountered (81.9%). Conclusion:Despite variation in perioperative management of EESBS patients, important trends were identified by this study. Further investigation is needed to standardize perioperative practice pa erns in EESBS. C 2017 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Although SCC with and without IP association are considered different diseases, their demographics and outcomes seem similar. Nodal metastasis was noted to be higher in the SCC cohort, which may indicate different tumor biology. Further study is warranted.

No abstract

No abstract