Context The tensions that emerge between the universal and the local in a global world require continuous negotiation. However, in medical education, standardization and contextual diversity tend to operate as separate philosophies, with little attention to the interplay between them. Methods The authors synthesise the literature related to the intersections and resulting tensions between standardization and contextual diversity in medical education. In doing so, the authors analyze the interplay between these competing concepts in two domains of medical education (admissions and competency‐based medical education), and provide concrete examples drawn from the literature. Results Standardization offers many rewards: its common articulations and assumptions promote patient safety, foster continuous quality improvement, and enable the spread of best practices. Standardization may also contribute to greater fairness, equity, reliability and validity in high stakes processes, and can provide stakeholders, including the public, with tangible reassurance and a sense of the stable and timeless. At the same time, contextual variation in medical education can afford myriad learning opportunities, and it can improve alignment between training and local workforce needs. The inevitable diversity of contexts for learning and practice renders any absolute standardization of programs, experiences, or outcomes an impossibility. Conclusions The authors propose a number of ways to examine the interplay of contextual diversity and standardization and suggest three ways to move beyond an either/or stance. In reconciling the laudable goals of standardization and the realities of the innumerable contexts in which we train and deliver care, we are better positioned to design and deliver a medical education system that is globally responsible and locally engaged.

We contend that as learners participate in these discourses, they are also performatively produced by them. By making these discourses visible, we can consider how to minimise unintended effects such discourses may cause. Our findings, although limited, offer a glimpse of the effects that those assumptions may have as we look to align better the formation of professional medical identity with the ideals of patient-centred care and socially responsible health care systems.

Introduction Medical education continues to diversify its settings. For postgraduate trainees, moving across diverse settings, especially community‐based rotations, can be challenging personally and professionally. Competent performance is embedded in context; as a result, trainees who move to new contexts are challenged to use their knowledge, skills and experience to adjust. What trainees need to adapt to and what that requires of them are poorly understood. This research takes a capability approach to understand how trainees entering a new setting develop awareness of specific contextual changes that they need to navigate and learn from. Methods We used constructivist grounded theory with in‐depth interviews. A total of 29 trainees and recent graduates from three internal medicine training programmes in Canada participated. All participants had completed at least one community‐based rotation geographically far from their home training site. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The interview framework was adjusted several times following initial data analysis. Results Contextual competence results from trainees’ ability to attend to five key stages. Participants had first to meet their physiological and practical needs, followed by developing a sense of belonging and legitimacy, which paved the way for a re‐constitution of competence and appropriate autonomy. Trainee's attention to these stages of adaptation was facilitated by a process of continuously moving between using their knowledge and skill foundation and recognising where and when contextual differences required new learning and adaptations. Discussion An ability to recognise contextual change and adapt accordingly is part of Nussbaum and Sen's concept of capability development. We argue this key skill has not received the attention it deserves in current training models and in the support postgraduate trainees receive in practice. Recommendations include supporting residents in their capability development by debriefing their experiences of moving between settings and supporting clinical teachers as they actively coach residents through this process.

No abstract

Changes in the health care landscape over the last 25 years have led to an expansion of training sites beyond the traditional academic health sciences center. The resulting contextual diversity in contemporary medical education affords new opportunities to consider the influence of contextual variation on learning. The authors describe how different contextual patterns in clinical learning environments-patients, clinical and educational practices, physical geography, health care systems, and culture-form a contextual learning matrix. Learners' participation in this contextual matrix shapes what and how they learn, and who they might become as physicians.Although competent performance is critically dependent on context, this dependence may not be actively considered or shaped by medical educators. Moreover, learners' inability to recognize the educational affordances of different contexts may mean that they miss critical learning opportunities, which in turn may affect patient care, particularly in the unavoidable times of transition that characterize a professional career. Learners therefore need support in recognizing the variability of learning opportunities afforded by different training contexts. The authors set out the concept of the contextual curriculum in medical education as that which is learned both intentionally and unintentionally from the settings in which learning takes place. Further, the authors consider strategies for medical educators through which the contextual curriculum can be made apparent and tangible to learners as they navigate a professional trajectory where their environments are not fixed but fluid and where change is a constant.