Summary Sulodexide is a glycosaminoglycan extracted from porcine intestinal mucosa. The purpose of this review is to discuss sulodexide's complex pharmacological profile and its clinical applications for venous disease. Sulodexide has wide‐ranging biological effects on the vascular system, including antithrombotic, profibrinolytic, anti‐inflammatory, endothelial protective and vasoregulatory effects. Sulodexide has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for the management of chronic venous insufficiency, including venous ulceration, and the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, with a low rate of major bleeding complications. Sulodexide's pleiotropic vascular effects may facilitate the management of common venous disorders.

Intraluminal esophageal temperature ≥ 39°C is detected more frequently by the multi-sensor temperature probe versus the single-sensor probe, with more frequent esophageal injury and with comparable severity of injury. Despite detecting esophageal temperature rises in more patients, the multi-sensor probe may not have any measurable benefit compared to a single-sensor probe.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Lymphedema is a chronic condition that carries a significant physical, psychosocial, and economic burden. The authors’ program was established in 2017 with the aims of providing immediate lymphatic reconstruction in high-risk patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and performing delayed lymphatic reconstruction in patients with chronic lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to describe the authors’ clinical experience in the first year. Methods: A retrospective review of our clinical database was performed on all individuals presenting to the authors’ institution for lymphatic surgery consideration. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgical management were reviewed. Results: A total of 142 patients presented for lymphatic surgery evaluation. Patients had a mean age of 54.8 years and an average body mass index of 30.4 kg/m2. Patients with lymphedema were more likely to be referred from an outside facility compared to patients seeking immediate lymphatic reconstruction (p < 0.001). For patients with lymphedema, the most common cause was breast cancer related. Thirty-two percent of all patients evaluated underwent a lymphatic procedure. Of these, 32 were immediate lymphatic reconstructions and 13 were delayed lymphatic reconstructions. In the authors’ first year, 94 percent of eligible patients presenting for immediate lymphatic reconstruction underwent an intervention versus only 38 percent of eligible lymphedema patients presenting for delayed lymphatic reconstruction (p < 0.001). Conclusions: First-year review of our lymphatic surgery experience has demonstrated clinical need evidenced by the number of patients and high percentage of outside referrals. As a program develops, lymphatic surgeons should expect to perform more time-sensitive immediate lymphatic reconstructions, as evaluation of chronic lymphedema requires development of a robust team for workup and review.

Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

While the presence of gender disparities in cardiovascular disease have been described, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact of sex in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We identified all patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital with acute PE between August 1, 2012 through July 1, 2018. We stratified the presenting characteristics, management, and outcomes between women and men. Of the 2031 patients admitted with acute PE, 1081 (53.2%) were women. Women were more likely to present with dyspnea (59.8% vs 52.0%, p < 0.001) and less likely to present with hemoptysis (1.9% vs 4.0%, p = 0.01). Women were older (63.8 ± 17.4 years vs 62.3 ± 15.0 years, p = 0.04), but had lower rates of myocardial infarction, liver disease, smoking history, and prior DVT. PE severity was similar between women and men (massive: 4.9% vs 3.6%; submassive: 43.9% vs 41.8%; p = 0.19), yet women were more likely to present with normal right ventricular size on a surface echocardiogram (63.2% vs 54.8%, p = 0.01). In unadjusted analyses, women were less likely to survive to discharge (92.4% vs 94.7%, p = 0.04), but after adjustment, there was no sex-based survival difference. There were no sex differences in the PE-related diagnostic studies performed, use of advanced therapies, or short-term outcomes, before and after adjustment ( p > 0.05 for all). In this large PE cohort from a tertiary care institution, women had different comorbidity profiles and PE presentations compared with men. Despite these differences, there were no sex disparities in PE management or outcomes.

No abstract