BackgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) can result in significant morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). It is common practice to place prophylactic surgical drains during DP to monitor and minimize POPF complications; however, their use is controversial.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to determine if drainage helps to prevent adverse outcomes and decrease the need for additional interventions after DP.MethodsAll patients who underwent DP without vascular resection were identified in the 2014 Targeted Pancreatectomy American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Patients undergoing emergency procedures, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 5, or diagnosed with preoperative sepsis were excluded. Univariate and multiple variable analyses were performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes based on use of surgical drain.ResultsA total of 1158 patients (age median: 62; interquartile range: 16; female 58.6%) underwent elective DP with 85.1% (n = 985) having drain placed at time of operation. Laparoscopic technique was used in the majority of patients (54.1%, n = 619). POPF occurred in 201 patients (17.5%). Additional percutaneous drain was required in 106 patients (9.2%). POPF was higher in surgical drain group, 19.4% vs 6.9% (P < .001). Need for percutaneous drain was similar between drain and no drain groups, 9.3% vs 8.1% (P = .600). Postoperative sepsis, shock, major complication, reoperation, and 30‐day mortality was similar between drain and no drain groups (all P > .05). However, readmission was higher in the surgical drain group, 17.8% vs 10.4% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1‐3.1; P = .018). After adjusting for age, ASA, and operative time, readmission remained higher in the surgical drain group (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1‐3.2; P = .016).ConclusionThe use of surgical drainage during DP was associated with increased incidence of readmission and POPF. Drainage showed no effect on outcomes of postoperative sepsis, shock, major complications, reoperation, and 30‐day mortality. Based on these results, routine prophylactic drainage should be reconsidered for patients undergoing DP.
This study reports the clinical and pharmacokinetic results following an injection of latamoxef (moxalactam disodium) in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Two groups were involved in the study. Group A consisted of 22 patients who received 1 g of intramuscular latamoxef at the time of premedication prior to surgery, and group B consisted of 12 patients each of whom received an intravenous dose of 0.5 g of latamoxef at the time of anaesthetic induction. Latamoxef levels were then measured in peripheral blood, gall bladder bile, common bile duct (CBD) bile and gall bladder wall. Despite a significant difference in the sampling times, inhibitory levels were obtained in the majority of samples in both groups, singularly high levels being assayed in CBD bile. We conclude that an intravenous dosage of latamoxef (0.5 g) given with anaesthetic induction is as effective as 1 g intramuscular dosage given with the pre-medication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.