Aim Determine levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms and factors associated with psychological burden amongst critical care health care workers in the early stages of the coronavirus disease (2019) (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods Anonymous web-based survey distributed in April 2020. All health care workers employed in a critical care setting were eligible to participate. Invitations to the survey were distributed through Australian and New Zealand critical care societies and social media platforms. The primary outcome was the proportion of health care workers that reported moderate to extremely severe scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Results Of the 3770 complete responses, 3039 (80.6%) were from Australia. A total of 2871 respondents (76.2%) were female; median age was 41 years old. Nurses made up 2269 (60.2%) of respondents with most [2029 (53.8%)] working in Intensive Care Units.Overall, 813 (21.6%) respondents reported moderate to extremely severe depression, 1078 (28.6%) reported moderate to extremely severe anxiety and 1057 (28.0%) moderate to extremely severe stress scores. Mean ± standard deviation DASS-21 depression, anxiety and stress scores amongst woman vs men were: 8.0 ± 8.2 vs 7.1 ± 8.2 (p=0.003); 7.2 ± 7.5 vs 5.0 ± 6.7 (p<0.001); and 14.4 ± 9.6 vs 12.5 ± 9.4 (p<0.001) respectively.After adjusting for significant confounders, clinical concerns associated with higher DASS-21 scores included; not being clinically prepared (β 4.2, p<0.001), an inadequate workforce (β 2.4, p=0.001), having to triage patients due to lack of beds and or equipment (β 2.6, p=0.001), virus transmission to friends and family (β 2.1, p=0.009), contracting COVID-19 (β 2.8, p=0.011), being responsible for other staff (β 3.1, p<0.001), and being asked to work in an area that was not in the respondents expertise (β 5.7, p<0.001). Conclusion In this survey of critical care health care workers, between 22 and 29% of respondents reported moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety and stress symptoms with females reporting higher scores compared to men. Although female gender appears to play a role, modifiable factors also contribute to psychological burden and should be studied further.

Background Critical care health care professionals are a key part of any pandemic response and are at increased risk for physical and psychological harm, yet their self-reported suggestions to ameliorate the negative effects of pandemics on their wellbeing have rarely been sought. Objectives To explore and interpret themes of critical care health care professionals’ responses to the question ‘What do you think could assist your wellbeing during the COVID-19 crisis?’. Methods A descriptive study using an online survey, performed in April 2020, investigating pandemic preparedness and psychological burden during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic among critical care professionals. Informal snowball sampling was used. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from an open-ended survey item was informed by Braun and Clark. Findings Eighty percent (2,387/3,770) of respondents completed the open-ended question. Three themes were generated from the synthesis: adequate resourcing for the role; consistent, clear information and prioritised communications; the need for genuine kindness and provision of support for HCP wellbeing. Conclusions There is merit for considering the perceptions, concerns and suggestions of critical care clinicians during a pandemic. Suggestions included simple measures to maintain physical and mental health, clear messaging, consistent information, trust in health and political leaders, supportive working environments, specific training, and allowances for personal circumstances. This information is important for health and political leaders and policy makers to implement strategies to reduce the burden associated with delivering care in the context of a pandemic.

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: Outbreaks of known and novel pathogens causing very severe illness increase the risk to public health in a globalised community and alarm the public. Intensive care units (ICUs) may be an underused setting for public health surveillance. This study investigates the electronic Record for Intensive Care (eRIC), an electronic clinical information and management system being developed for New South Wales ICUs, and its surveillance opportunity offerings. Methods:The surveillance benefits being introduced by the eRIC were evaluated through consultation with stakeholders and the eRIC program team. The consultation process involved providing stakeholders with background information about the eRIC system. Based on the consultation, a draft data and information model for surveillance was developed. The model was evaluated using guidelines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Results: Population health stakeholders confirmed that the eRIC offers an appealing surveillance data source for pathogens and other hazards causing severe illness. Suggested application of the surveillance included, for known hazards, seasonal and pandemic influenza, enterovirus 71, Murray Valley encephalitis virus, enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0104:H4 and parechovirus. The proposed surveillance model uses syndromic rather than specific-cause surveillance. It may offer greater timeliness and sensitivity than relying on reporting of diagnoses of specific pathogens. Five syndromes derived from clinical pathways in the eRIC are proposed: severe acute respiratory disease, severe acute neurological disease, sepsis or septicaemia, jaundice or hepatitis, and acute renal failure. Conclusion:New intensive care clinical information systems offer a largely untapped resource for continuous, mainstream, rapid ICU surveillance of severe illness. A continuous, mainstream, rapid ICU surveillance facility that will readily adapt to emergency situations would be a valuable resource for protecting population health. This study establishes a firm basis on which ICU surveillance can be developed.Towards public health surveillance of intensive care services in NSW, Australia

Objective: To determine an appropriate survey instrument to evaluate the impact of organizational structures on the work environment of intensive care nurses. Background:Internationally the demand for intensive care is increasing. Solely increasing bed capacity is not sustainable. Large capacity multi-specialty Intensive Care Units are emerging as the preferred organizational model with benefits resulting from optimizing operational synergies and economies of scale. The impact of this organizational transition on intensive care nurses is not well understood. An appropriate survey instrument for intensive care nurses is required. Design: Integrative literature review. Data Sources: CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE and OVID Nursing databases searched for studies published between 2005 and 2013.Review methods: An integrative review and quality assessment of the studies was undertaken to select nurse outcome measures associated with organizational structures across a range of acute and critical care settings. Congruence between nurse outcome measures and nurse survey instruments tested in the literature was assessed to select instruments for further psychometric evaluation.Results: Thirty-one cross sectional quantitative studies, from fourteen countries, were reviewed. Twenty one nurse outcome measures associated with organizational factors were identified and a total of twenty five survey instruments used in the studies reviewed. Assessment of congruence and psychometric properties determined that a combination of two instruments is required to comprehensively assess the organizational environment of nurses working in intensive care units. Conclusion:The environment of nurses working in intensive care is effectively evaluated with an instrument that combines subscales from the Practice Environment Scale-Nurse Work Index and Maslach's Burnout Inventory.

Aim: To investigate critical care resourcing and the clinical management of sepsis in lower-middle income, upper-middle income and high income countries across the Asia Pacific region. Background: Sepsis is a time-critical complex condition that requires evidence-based care delivered by appropriate levels of well trained, qualified and experienced staff supported by proactive organisational and quality processes, sophisticated technologies and reliable infrastructure. In 2017, the estimated sepsis incidence in the Asia Pacific region ranged from 120 to 200 per 100,000 population in Australia and New Zealand to 2500 to 3400 per 100,000 population in India. Currently, there is limited information on the organisational structures, human resources, clinical standards, laboratory support and the therapeutic options available in the Asia Pacific region to treat sepsis. Method: Prospective electronic survey. Results: Representatives of 59 hospitals from 15 countries responded. Provision of critical care and the management of sepsis varied considerably between lower-middle income, upper-middle income and high income countries. Specific differences include nurse to patient ratios and availability of allied health services. Conventional organ support modalities such as mechanical ventilation and non-invasive ventilation were commonly available. Even advanced life support like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was available in at least 60% of surveyed ICUs. However, in contrast, essential monitoring devices including EtCO2 were not universally available. Lower-middle income countries had considerably lower provisions for isolation and surge capacity to support pandemic and disaster management, though basic personal protective equipment was widely available. A majority of ICUs used the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines or the adapted version for lower-middle income countries, though only 21% of ICUs in lower-middle income countries used the adapted version. While essential antimicrobials were accessible across most ICUs, availability of reserve antibiotics was limited. Conclusion: The disparities identified in this survey inform healthcare workers and health services, policy makers and governments on the priorities for action to improve the delivery of critical care and sepsis outcomes in this region. Keywords: critical care, disaster, resources, sepsis

Aim: To explore the relationship between the practice environment and nurse outcomes in two Intensive Care Unit (ICU) models. Background: Internationally the demand for intensive care is increasing. A large capacity multi-specialty integrated critical care service, the "hot-floor", is emerging as the preferred organisational model. Benefits include resource consolidation and improved utilisation, operational synergies, operational flexibility and demand management. A large clinical workforce with commensurate frontline management, education and support positions are required. The association between these factors, within the ICU hot-floor work environment, and nurse outcomes is not known. Methods: Registered nurses (RNs) working in two ICUs, one a hot-floor model and one traditional ICU, completed a structured questionnaire. Nurse perceptions of work-life and organisational factors, and dimensions of burnout were examined using the Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and Maslach's Burnout Inventory (MBI). Results: Units matched on service level characteristics, training accreditation, patient casemix, operational and clinical care processes. Nurses in had similar demographic characteristics, professional attributes and experience. Workforce structures were also similar though the hot-floor had relatively less dedicated resources for frontline nurse management and clinical education positions. Hot-floor nurses worked more paid overtime and were redeployed less frequently to external wards. Nurse manager leadership and support was less effective, and nurses expressed lower personal accomplishment. Conclusions: Improved demand management achieved through greater operational flexibility is a key driver for the hot-floor model. Planning for enhanced organisational effectiveness requires corresponding improvements in the work environment to optimise nurse retention to ensure organisational sustainability.