If a psychologist loses treatment records because of a computer failure, is it an ethical violation? The widespread growth of technology has outpaced the development of ethical standards for questions such as this, resulting in areas of uncertainty for psychologists. Four hundred twenty psychologists in independent practice rated the ethicality and their frequency of using 40 technologies. Technologies pertaining to the support functions of a psychologist's office are commonly used, butthose technologies directly affecting clinical services are rarely used. More than half of the 40 items received equivocal ratings on ethicality, suggesting psychologists need guidelines and training for the use of technology in professional practice. A typical day in a professional psychologist's office might include photocopying or faxing confidential records, electronic claims filing, using a computerized voice mail system, scoring personality tests on the computer, and so on. A few psychologists might also provide supervision by means of electronic mail (Email) or exposure treatments with virtual reality. How common are these various technologies in psychological practice, and what are the ethical implications of emerging technological advances within the profession? When Pope, Tabachnick, and Keith-Spiegel (1987) published survey results concerning the ethics of professional psychologists, their report provided an important "real-world" glimpse into the practices and beliefs of American Psychological Association (AP A) members providing professional services. The authors were careful to note that the norms of professional practice should not necessarily determine ethical standards but correctly observed that professional ethics codes are most effective when those developing the codes are aware of the dilemmas and tensions confronting members of the organization. Although the AP A has been diligent to keep ethical standards current through changing practice environments, the rapid rate of change observed among electronic technologies creates unprecedented challenges for professional psychology's national organizations and ethics committees. The APA Ethics Committee ap

Wheaton College unscrupulous profiteers abuse this time of transition for their own benefit. Learning democracy is almost as painful as living under dictatorship. Anarchic m oments cannot be ignored. The old apparatus has been deprived of its power, and the new social forces still lack experience, (p. 1387) Values that were binding and predictable in the past are gone without the establishment of new equivalents. In most countries, there is a lack of objects o f identification. Fear of poverty and unemployment weigh heavily on many people. The "b io lo g ica lly " stronger o ften dom inate the weaker, and

The debates of the 1980s regarding responsible use of computer-based test interpretation (CBTI) software have mostly disappeared, as CBTI use has become common practice. We surveyed 364 members of the Society for Personality Assessment to determine how they use CBTI software in their work and their perspectives on the ethics of using CBTI in various ways. Psychologists commonly use CBTI software for test scoring and to provide a complementary source of input for case formulations. Most do not use CBTI software as the primary way to formulate a case, nor as an alternative to a written report. Controversy and uncertainty were expressed about importing sections of CBTI narratives into psychological reports. We distinguish between support and replacement functions of CBTI use, arguing that adequate research evidence should be present before using CBTI as a replacement for established assessment procedures.

No abstract

No abstract