Summary Although autophagy controls cell death and survival, underlying mechanisms are poorly understood and it is unknown if autophagy just affects whether or not cells die or also controls other aspects of programmed cell death. MAP3K7 is a tumor suppressor gene associated with poor disease-free survival in prostate cancer. Here we report that Map3k7 deletion in mouse prostate cells sensitizes to cell death by TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL). Surprisingly, this death occurs primarily through necroptosis, not apoptosis, due to assembly of the necrosome in association with the autophagy machinery, mediated by p62/SQSTM1 recruitment of RIPK1. The mechanism of cell death switches to apoptosis if p62-dependent recruitment of the necrosome to the autophagy machinery is blocked. These data show that the autophagy machinery can control the mechanism of programmed cell death by serving as a scaffold rather than by degrading cargo.

Macroautophagy (autophagy) is intimately linked with cell death and allows cells to evade apoptosis. This has prompted clinical trials to combine autophagy inhibitors with other drugs with the aim of increasing the likelihood of cancer cells dying. However, the molecular basis for such effects is unknown. Here, we describe a transcriptional mechanism that connects autophagy to apoptosis. The autophagy-regulating transcription factor, FOXO3a, is itself turned over by basal autophagy creating a potential feedback loop. Increased FOXO3a upon autophagy inhibition stimulates transcription of the pro-apoptotic BBC3/PUMA gene to cause apoptosis sensitization. This mechanism explains how autophagy inhibition can sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapy drugs and allows an autophagy inhibitor to change the action of an MDM2-targeted drug from growth inhibition to apoptosis, reducing tumor burden in vivo. Thus, a link between two processes mediated via a single transcription factor binding site in the genome can be leveraged to improve anti-cancer therapies.

Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) is an evolutionarily-ancient mechanism by which cellular material is delivered to lysosomes for degradation. Autophagy and cell death are intimately linked. For example, both processes often use the same molecular machinery and recent work suggests that autophagy has great influence over a cell’s decision to live or die. However, this decision making is complicated by the fact that autophagy’s role in determining whether a cell should live or die goes both ways—autophagy inhibition can result in more or less cell death depending on the death stimulus, cell type, or context. Autophagy may also differentially affect different types of cell death. Here we discuss recent literature that helps make sense of this seemingly inconsistent role of autophagy in influencing a cell to live or die.

Highlights d An acute CRISPR/Cas9 assay identifies autophagydependent cancer cell lines d Autophagy-dependent cells can undergo selection to circumvent loss of autophagy d Cancer cells acquire dependence on NRF2 signaling to maintain proteostasis d Adaptation to loss of autophagy increases sensitivity to proteasome inhibition

Kinase inhibitors are effective cancer therapies, but tumors frequently develop resistance. Current strategies to circumvent resistance target the same or parallel pathways. We report here that targeting a completely different process, autophagy, can overcome multiple BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms in brain tumors. BRAFV600Emutations occur in many pediatric brain tumors. We previously reported that these tumors are autophagy-dependent and a patient was successfully treated with the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine after failure of the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib, suggesting autophagy inhibition overcame the kinase inhibitor resistance. We tested this hypothesis in vemurafenib-resistant brain tumors. Genetic and pharmacological autophagy inhibition overcame molecularly distinct resistance mechanisms, inhibited tumor cell growth, and increased cell death. Patients with resistance had favorable clinical responses when chloroquine was added to vemurafenib. This provides a fundamentally different strategy to circumvent multiple mechanisms of kinase inhibitor resistance that could be rapidly tested in clinical trials in patients with BRAFV600E brain tumors.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19671.001

Autophagic receptor p62 is a critical mediator of cell detoxification, stress response, and metabolic programs and is commonly deregulated in human diseases. The diverse functions of p62 arise from its ability to interact with a large set of ligands, such as arginylated (Nt-R) substrates. Here, we describe the structural mechanism for selective recognition of Nt-R by the ZZ domain of p62 (p62ZZ). We show that binding of p62ZZ to Nt-R substrates stimulates p62 aggregation and macroautophagy and is required for autophagic targeting of p62. p62 is essential for mTORC1 activation in response to arginine, but it is not a direct sensor of free arginine in the mTORC1 pathway. We identified a regulatory linker (RL) region in p62 that binds p62ZZ in vitro and may modulate p62 function. Our findings shed new light on the mechanistic and functional significance of the major cytosolic adaptor protein p62 in two fundamental signaling pathways.

The molecular machinery linking macroautophagy (autophagy hereafter) to apoptosis is still being elucidated. A recent study found that the transcription factor FOXO3/FOXO3A (forkhead box O3), which regulates autophagy, is itself regulated by basal autophagy to determine apoptosis sensitivity. Autophagy inhibition confers cell sensitivity to anti-cancer agents, and this effect is explained by the ability of FOXO3 to transactivate the pro-apoptotic gene BBC3/PUMA. Here, we discuss the possibility that FOXO3 acts as a cell surveillance mechanism to correct autophagy perturbations (i.e., autophagy inhibition), and confers apoptosis sensitization if this autophagy imbalance is not rectified.

Molecular alterations that confer phenotypic advantages to tumors can also expose specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. To search for potential treatments that would selectively affect metastatic cells, we examined the sensitivity of lineage-related human bladder cancer cell lines with different lung colonization abilities to chloroquine (CQ) or bafilomycin A, which are inhibitors of lysosome function and autophagy. Both CQ and bafilomycin A were more cytotoxic in vitro to highly metastatic cells compared with their less metastatic counterparts. Genetic inactivation of macroautophagy regulators and lysosomal proteins indicated that this was due to greater reliance on the lysosome but not upon macroautophagy. To identify the mechanism underlying these effects, we generated cells resistant to CQ in vitro. Surprisingly, selection for in vitro CQ resistance was sufficient to alter gene expression patterns such that unsupervised cluster analysis of whole-transcriptome data indicated that selection for CQ resistance alone created tumor cells that were more similar to the poorly metastatic parental cells from which the metastatic cells were derived; importantly, these tumor cells also had diminished metastatic ability in vivo. These effects were mediated in part by differential expression of the transcriptional regulator ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4); depletion of ID4 both promoted in vitro CQ sensitivity and restored lung colonization and metastasis of CQ-resistant cells. These data demonstrate that selection for metastasis ability confers selective vulnerability to lysosomal inhibitors and identify ID4 as a potential biomarker for the use of lysosomal inhibitors to reduce metastasis in patients.