Virus-like-particle (VLP) influenza vaccines can be given intramuscularly (i.m.) or intranasally (i.n.) and may have advantages over split-virion formulations in the elderly. We tested a plant-made VLP vaccine candidate bearing the viral hemagglutinin (HA) delivered either i.m. or i.n. in young and aged mice. Young adult (5-to 8-week-old) and aged (16-to 20-month-old) female BALB/c mice received a single 3-g dose based on the HA (A/California/07/2009 H1N1) content of a plant-made H1-VLP (i.m. or i.n.) split-virion vaccine (i.m.) or were left naive. After vaccination, humoral and splenocyte responses were assessed, and some mice were challenged. Both VLP and split vaccines given i.m. protected 100% of the young animals, but the VLP group lost the least weight and had stronger humoral and cellular responses. Compared to split-vaccine recipients, aged animals vaccinated i.m. with VLP were more likely to survive challenge (80% versus 60%). The lung viral load postchallenge was lowest in the VLP i.m. groups. Mice vaccinated with VLP i.n. had little detectable immune response, but survival was significantly increased. In both age groups, i.m. administration of the H1-VLP vaccine elicited more balanced humoral and cellular responses and provided better protection from homologous challenge than the splitvirion vaccine.KEYWORDS aged-mouse model, influenza, virus-like particles (VLPs), plant-made vaccines A ccording to the World Health Organization, influenza epidemics account for 250,000 to 500,000 deaths worldwide every year (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs211/en/). Although vaccines are widely recommended to protect against influenza, the elderly often respond poorly, in part due to prior experience with influenza virus antigens (Ag) (1), but also as a result of immunosenescence (2). The latter affects both innate and adaptive immune responses and has broad implications for both natural infection and vaccination (1, 2).Influenza vaccines for adults are administered by either intramuscular (i.m.) or intradermal injection of detergent-split virions at a fixed dose of 15 g hemagglutinin (HA)/strain (3). These vaccines typically elicit strong antibody responses in healthy young adults and achieve vaccine efficacy (VE) that varies between strains and years but averages 50 to 60% (4). These formulations work less well in the elderly (5
BackgroundAdministered intramuscularly (IM), plant-derived, virus-like-particle (VLP) vaccines based on the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) protein elicit both humoral and cellular responses that can protect aged mice from lethal challenge. Unlike split virus vaccines, VLPs can be administered by different routes including intranasally (IN). We evaluated novel vaccine strategies such as prime-pull (IM boosted by IN) and multi-modality vaccination (IM and IN given simultaneously). We wished to determine if these approaches would provide better quality protection in old mice after less severe (borderline-lethal) challenge (ie: immunogenicity, frailty and survival).ResultsSurvival rates were similar in all vaccinated groups. Antibody responses were modest in all groups but tended to be higher in VLP groups compared to inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) recipients. All VLP groups had higher splenocyte T cell responses than the split virus group. Lung homogenate chemokine/cytokine levels and virus loads were lower in the VLP groups compared to IIV recipients 3 days after challenge (p < 0.05 for viral load vs all VLP groups combined). The VLP-vaccinated groups also had less weight loss and recovered more rapidly than the IIV recipients. There was limited evidence of an immunologic or survival advantage with IN delivery of the VLP vaccine.ConclusionCompared to IIV, the plant-derived VLP vaccine induced a broader immune response in aged mice (cellular and humoral) using either traditional (IM/IM) or novel schedules (multi-modality, prime-pull).
BackgroundThe elderly are at high risk from influenza, in part because immunity wanes with age and through the accumulation of comorbidities. A novel plant-derived virus-like-particle (VLP) vaccine bearing influenza hemagglutinin can induce a balanced humoral and cellular response in old mice (16–18 months) while split virion vaccines elicit mostly antibodies. Because mice also collect comorbidities and lose immune competence as they age, we wished to determine how the plant-derived VLP vaccine would perform in animals approaching the end of their life-span.Materials and methodsOld (24–26 months) female BALB/c mice received two intramuscular doses of H1-VLP vaccine, an inactivated H1N1 vaccine (IIV) (both based on A/H1N1/California/07/09) (3μg each) or PBS. Serum was collected on day 42 and humoral responses were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), microneutralization (MN) and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays. Influenza-specific splenocyte CD4+ & CD8+ T cell responses were measured by flow cytometry. Full body computed tomography (CT) and structured necropsies were performed on day 42. Comorbidities including reduced lung volume (kyphosis), masses, abscesses, etc. were assessed using a standard scoring system (1–21) and mice with scores ≥5 were considered to have important comorbidities.ResultsOverall, 53.3% of the animals had significant comorbidities. Three weeks post-boost, HI and MN titres were mostly undetectable but ELISA titres were significantly higher in the H1-VLP animals compared to the IIV group (GMT (95% CI): 961 (427, 2163) vs 425 (200, 903): p = 0.03). Both CD4+(TNFα, IFNγ) and CD8+ (IFNγ) T cell responses were also greater in the H1-VLP group than the IIV.ConclusionsEven in very old mice with comorbidities, the plant-made H1-VLP vaccine elicited a stronger and more balanced immune response than IIV. Animals with fewer comorbidities tended to have the better composite (humoral and cellular) responses. These novel vaccines have the potential to address some of the limitations of current vaccines in the elderly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.