We describe a promising and novel mAb as therapy for lethal, XDR A. baumannii infections, and demonstrate that it synergistically improves outcomes in combination with antibiotics.
BackgroundOver-ordering of daily laboratory tests adversely affects patient care through hospital-acquired anaemia, patient discomfort, burden on front-line staff and unnecessary downstream testing. This remains a prevalent issue despite the 2013 Choosing Wisely recommendation to minimise unnecessary daily labs. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify interventions targeting unnecessary laboratory testing.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and SCOPUS databases to identify interventions focused on reducing daily complete blood count, complete metabolic panel and basic metabolic panel labs. We defined interventions as ‘effective’ if a statistically significant reduction was attained and ‘highly effective’ if a reduction of ≥25% was attained.ResultsThe search yielded 5646 studies with 41 articles that met inclusion criteria. We grouped interventions into one or more categories: audit and feedback, cost display, education, electronic medical record (EMR) change, and policy change. Most interventions lasted less than a year and used a multipronged approach. All five strategies were effective in most studies with EMR change being the most commonly used independent strategy. EMR change and policy change were the strategies most frequently reported as effective. EMR change was the strategy most frequently reported as highly effective.ConclusionOur analysis identified five categories of interventions targeting daily laboratory testing. All categories were effective in most studies, with EMR change being most frequently highly effective.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021254076.
Background: Although long suspected, it has yet to be shown whether the foot and ankle deformities of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are generally associated with abnormalities in osseous shape. Computed tomography (CT) was used to quantify morphologic differences of the calcaneus, talus, and navicular in CMT compared with healthy controls. Methods: Weightbearing CT scans of 21 patients (27 feet) with CMT were compared to those of 20 healthy controls. Calcaneal measurements included radius of curvature, sagittal posterior tuberosity-posterior facet angle, and tuberosity coronal rotation. Talar measurements included axial and sagittal body-neck declination angle, and coronal talar head rotation. Surface-mesh model analysis of the hindfoot was performed comparing the average of the CMT cohort to the controls using a CT analysis software (Disior Bonelogic 2.0). Means were compared with a t test ( P < .05). Results: CMT patients had significantly less talar sagittal declination vs controls (17.8 vs 25.1 degrees; P < .05). Similarly, CMT patients had less talar head coronal rotation vs controls (30.8 vs 42.5 degrees; P < .001). The calcaneal radius of curvature in CMT patients was significantly smaller than controls (822.8 vs 2143.5 mm; P < .05). CMT sagittal posterior tuberosity–posterior facet angle was also significantly different from that of controls (60.3 vs 67.9 degrees respectively; P < .001). Surface-mesh model analysis demonstrated the largest differences in morphology at the navicular tuberosity, medial talar head, sustentaculum tali, and anterior process of the calcaneus. Conclusion: This is the first study to quantify the morphologic differences in hindfoot osteology seen in CMT patients. Patients identified with osseous changes of the calcaneus, especially a smaller axial radius of curvature, may benefit from a 3-dimensional osteotomy for correction.
Study Design Retrospective database study. Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the influence of weekend admission on patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion by investigating hospital readmission outcomes and analyzing differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative factors. Methods The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify adult patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend admission patients. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and discharge status data were compiled. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission. Univariate logistic regression analyzed the relationship between weekday or weekend admission and 30- or 90-day readmission, and multivariate regression determined the impact of covariates. Results 177,847 patients were identified in total, with 176,842 in the weekday cohort and 1005 in the weekend cohort. Multivariate regression analysis found that 30-day readmissions were significantly greater for the weekend cohort after adjusting for sex, age, Medicare or Medicaid status, and comorbidity status (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.60-2.48; P < .001), and 90-day readmissions were also greater for the weekend cohort after adjustment (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.68-2.40, P < .001). Conclusions Patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery who are initially admitted on weekends are more likely to experience hospital readmission. These patients have increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis, postoperative infection, and non-routine discharge status. These factors are potential areas of focus for reducing the impact of the “weekend effect” and improving outcomes for elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
We conducted a quality improvement project at our large, public, tertiary-care, academic hospital to reduce the Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) of hospital-acquired Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs). Our diagnostic stewardship program, based on education and audit and feedback, significantly reduced inpatient urine culture orders and CAUTI SIR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.