Disruption of circadian rhythm by means of shift work has been associated with cardiovascular disease in humans. However, causality and underlying mechanisms have not yet been established. In this study, we exposed hyperlipidemic APOE*3‐Leiden.CETP mice to either regular light‐dark cycles, weekly 6 hours phase advances or delays, or weekly alternating light‐dark cycles (12 hours shifts), as a well‐established model for shift work. We found that mice exposed to 15 weeks of alternating light‐dark cycles displayed a striking increase in atherosclerosis, with an approximately twofold increase in lesion size and severity, while mice exposed to phase advances and delays showed a milder circadian disruption and no significant effect on atherosclerosis development. We observed a higher lesion macrophage content in mice exposed to alternating light‐dark cycles without obvious changes in plasma lipids, suggesting involvement of the immune system. Moreover, while no changes in the number or activation status of circulating monocytes and other immune cells were observed, we identified increased markers for inflammation, oxidative stress, and chemoattraction in the vessel wall. Altogether, this is the first study to show that circadian disruption by shifting light‐dark cycles directly aggravates atherosclerosis development.

A quantitative dynamics pathway map of the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response and p53-related DNA damage response pathways as well as the cross-talk between these pathways has not systematically been defined. To allow the dynamic single cell evaluation of these pathways, we have used BAC-GFP recombineering to tag for each pathway's three key components: for the oxidative stress response, Keap1-GFP, Nrf2-GFP, and Srxn1-GFP; for the DNA damage response, 53bp1-GFP, p53-GFP, and p21-GFP. The dynamic activation of these individual components was assessed using quantitative high throughput confocal microscopy after treatment with a broad concentration range of diethyl maleate (DEM; to induce oxidative stress) and etoposide (to induce DNA damage). DEM caused a rapid activation of Nrf2, which returned to baseline levels at low concentrations but remained sustained at high concentrations. Srxn1-GFP induction and Keap1-GFP translocation to autophagosomes followed later, with upper boundaries reached at high concentrations, close to the onset of cell death. Etoposide caused rapid accumulation of 53bp1-GFP in DNA damage foci, which was later followed by the concentration dependent nuclear accumulation of p53-GFP and subsequent induction of p21-GFP. While etoposide caused activation of Srxn1-GFP, a modest activation of DNA damage reporters was observed for DEM at high concentrations. Interestingly, Nrf2 knockdown caused an inhibition of the DNA damage response at high concentrations of etoposide, while Keap1 knockdown caused an enhancement of the DNA damage response already at low concentrations of etoposide. Knockdown of p53 did not affect the oxidative stress response. Altogether, the current stress response landscapes provide insight in the time course responses of and cross-talk between oxidative stress and DNA-damage and defines the tipping points where cell injury may switch from adaptation to injury.

The nuclear receptor Nur77 is expressed in a multitude of tissues, regulating cell differentiation and homeostasis. Dysregulation of Nur77 signaling is associated with cancer, cardiovascular disease, and disorders of the CNS. The role of Nur77 in T cells has been studied for almost 30 years now. There is a clear appreciation that Nur77 is crucial for apoptosis of self‐reactive T cells. However, the regulation and function of Nur77 in mature T cells remains largely unclear. In an exciting development, Nur77 has been recently demonstrated to impinge on cancer immunotherapy involving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). These studies indicated that Nur77 deficiency reduced T cell tolerance and exhaustion, thus raising the effectiveness of immune therapy in mice. Based on these novel insights, it may be proposed that regulation of Nur77 activity holds promise for innovative drug development in the field of cellular immunotherapy in cancer. In this review, we therefore summarize the role of Nur77 in T cell selection and maturation; and further develop the idea of targeting its activity in these cells as a potential strategy to augment current cancer immunotherapy treatments.