The main aim of this article is to investigate the accuracy of the Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Model (M-GARCH) for the selection of the best investment portfolio. There is extended literature on M-GARCH in this field with a great number of studies using different sets of variables among them the returns of assets, the volatility of the assets in the investment portfolio, the maturity date of the asset etc. The origin of M-GARCH is associated with the elements of the Dynamic Conditional Correlations Model (DDCM) as proposed by Engle. An earlier version of DDCM with time variations in the correlation matrix has been developed by Bollerslev. DCCM offers flexibility by incorporating different levels of volatilities able to structure portfolios with a great number of assets. M-GARCH models take into account separate univariate GARCH models, associate with each asset in the portfolio, in order to form a complete M-GARCH model. The present article uses a multiple dimension classic M-GARCH volatility model on a data set consisting from three time series. The daily ASE index on stock returns (Athens), the DAX index (Germany) and the CAC index (France). For each national index, the continuously compounded return was estimated as rt=100[log(pt)-log(pt-1)], where pt is the price on day t.
The purpose of the study is to show what kind of risks would have emerged for bank depositors if there are economical and political risks in a given country. For example, as is the case with the crisis in Greece, a threat or salvation for the banking organizational forms abroad exists regarding which type of bank development is more efficient, branches or subsidiaries. Respectively why do the big banks prefer to operate through branches and those which are focused on retail sales through subsidiaries? What impact could the political and economic risks have on the required reserves on the parent bank? Does the decision depend on the applied organizational form of the bank or on other reasons?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.