Objectives: This study aims to determine the qualification of the statute of two indigenous peoples residing in Crimean peninsula (Crimean Karaites and Krymchaks) in conditions of current interstate conflict. Materials and Methods: Coherent analysis was made according to the common principles of law, norms of international human right law, to the provisions of Ukrainian and Russian legislation and to the present scientific publications devoted to the history and ethnic origin of Crimean Karaites and Krymchaks Results: Author proved the duty of Ukraine to finish the procedure of official recognizing the Krymchaks and Karaites as the indigenous peoples (with the procedure in analogy for parliamentary Statement on Crimean Tatar People's statute on March 20, 2014) and to adopt the Law on the Status of Indigenous Peoples fixing the prescriptions of the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples on the principles of subsidiarity. Conclusion: collective political, economic, social and cultural rights of indigenous peoples must be defended despite any politic and military circumstances an situations of interstate conflict.
Strait" in the ad hoc Arbitrary Tribunal regarding the United Nations' Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 are not too effective in the environmental issues. Article pointed that in this Case No. 2017-06 Tribunal rejected own jurisdiction to the Ukraine's conventional demands as coastal State for the Crimean Peninsula, including the relevant issues of the maritime ecology. Authors propose to start preparations on Ukraine's next usage the mechanisms, established by the UN Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification technique, 1976. Relevant risks and possible results of such eventual usage were evaluated in the article.
Ук р а ї н с ь к и й ч а с о п и с м і ж н а р од н о го п р а в а № 2 / 2 0 1 9 Правове програмування та планування заходів протидії інформаційній агресії з Криму Тези присвячені порівняльному аналізу програмних та планових актів, схвалених в Україні з питань протидії інформаційній агресії з тимчасово окупованого Криму. Досліджено практику реалізації зазначених актів у діяльності Верховної Ради України та її комітетів, Представництва Президента України в АРК, інших центральних органів влади. Ключові слова: тимчасова окупація, спроба анексії, пропаганда війни, інформаційна агресія, незаконне телерадіомовлення. This article is devoted for the comparative analysis of the program and plan acts, adopted in Ukraine for counteraction the informational aggression from the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. Practice of realization the coherent acts by the Verkhovna Rada and its Committees, by the Mission of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and by other central power bodies are highlighted in the article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.