The identification of cyberattacks which target information and communication systems has been a focus of the research community for years. Network intrusion detection is a complex problem which presents a diverse number of challenges. Many attacks currently remain undetected, while newer ones emerge due to the proliferation of connected devices and the evolution of communication technology. In this survey, we review the methods that have been applied to network data with the purpose of developing an intrusion detector, but contrary to previous reviews in the area, we analyze them from the perspective of the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) process. As such, we discuss the techniques used for the capture, preparation and transformation of the data, as well as, the data mining and evaluation methods. In addition, we also present the characteristics and motivations behind the use of each of these techniques and propose more adequate

No abstract

As in other cybersecurity areas, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as a promising solution to detect Android malware. In this sense, many proposals employing a variety of algorithms and feature sets have been presented to date, often reporting impresive detection performances. However, the lack of reproducibility and the absence of a standard evaluation framework make these proposals difficult to compare. In this paper, we perform an analysis of 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a common evaluation framework. We have identified five factors that, if not taken into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly affect the trained ML models and their performances. In particular, we analyze the effect of (1) the presence of duplicated samples, (2) label (goodware/greyware/malware) attribution, (3) class imbalance, (4) the presence of apps that use evasion techniques and, (5) the evolution of apps. Based on this extensive experimentation, we conclude that the studied ML-based detectors have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results. Our findings also highlight that it is imperative to generate realistic datasets, taking into account the factors mentioned above, to enable the design and evaluation of better solutions for Android malware detection.

No abstract