The evolutionary significance of epigenetic inheritance is controversial. While epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation can affect gene function and change in response to environmental conditions, their role as carriers of heritable information is often considered anecdotal. Indeed, near-complete DNA methylation reprogramming, as occurs during mammalian embryogenesis, is a major hindrance for the transmission of nongenetic information between generations. Yet it remains unclear how general DNA methylation reprogramming is across the tree of life. Here we investigate the existence of epigenetic inheritance in the honey bee. We studied whether fathers can transfer epigenetic information to their daughters through DNA methylation. We performed instrumental inseminations of queens, each with four different males, retaining half of each male’s semen for whole genome bisulfite sequencing. We then compared the methylation profile of each father’s somatic tissue and semen with the methylation profile of his daughters. We found that DNA methylation patterns were highly conserved between tissues and generations. There was a much greater similarity of methylomes within patrilines (i.e., father-daughter subfamilies) than between patrilines in each colony. Indeed, the samples’ methylomes consistently clustered by patriline within colony. Samples from the same patriline had twice as many shared methylated sites and four times fewer differentially methylated regions compared to samples from different patrilines. Our findings indicate that there is no DNA methylation reprogramming in bees and, consequently, that DNA methylation marks are stably transferred between generations. This points to a greater evolutionary potential of the epigenome in invertebrates than there is in mammals.

The arrival of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor on the western honeybee Apis mellifera saw a change in the diversity and prevalence of honeybee RNA viruses. One virus in particular, deformed wing virus (DWV) has become closely associated with V. destructor , leading many to conclude that V. destructor has affected viral virulence by changing the mode of transmission. While DWV is normally transmitted via feeding and faeces, V. destructor transmits viruses by direct injection. This change could have resulted in higher viral prevalence causing increased damage to the bees. Here we test the effect of a change in the mode of transmission on the composition and levels of honeybee RNA viruses in the absence of V. destructor . We find a rapid increase in levels of two viruses, sacbrood virus (SBV) and black queen cell virus (BQCV) after direct injection of viral extracts into honeybee pupae. In pupae injected with high levels of DWV extracted from symptomatic adult bees, DWV levels rapidly decline in the presence of SBV and BQCV. Further, we observe high mortality in honeybee pupae when injected with SBV and BQCV, whereas injecting pupae with high levels of DWV results in near 100% survival. Our results suggest a different explanation for the observed association between V. destructor and DWV. Instead of V. destructor causing an increase in DWV virulence, we hypothesize that direct virus inoculation, such as that mediated by a vector, quickly eliminates the most virulent honeybee viruses resulting in an association with less virulent viruses such as DWV.

Eusocial insects can be defined as those that live in colonies and have distinct queens and workers. For most species, queens and workers arise from a common genome, and so caste-specific developmental trajectories must arise from epigenetic processes. In this review, we examine the epigenetic mechanisms that may be involved in the regulation of caste dimorphism. Early work on honeybees suggested that DNA methylation plays a causal role in the divergent development of queen and worker castes. This view has now been challenged by studies that did not find consistent associations between methylation and caste in honeybees and other species. Evidence for the involvement of methylation in modulating behaviour of adult workers is also inconsistent. Thus, the functional significance of DNA methylation in social insects remains equivocal. This article is part of the theme issue ‘How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?’

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification that mediates diverse processes such as cellular differentiation, phenotypic plasticity, and genomic imprinting. Mounting evidence suggests that local DNA sequence variation can be associated with particular DNA methylation states, indicating that the interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors may contribute synergistically to the phenotypic complexity of organisms. Social insects such as ants, bees, and wasps have extensive phenotypic plasticity manifested in their different castes, and this plasticity has been associated with variation in DNA methylation. Yet, the influence of genetic variation on DNA methylation state remains mostly unknown. Here we examine the importance of sequence-specific methylation at the genome-wide level, using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of the semen of individual honey bee males. We find that individual males harbor unique DNA methylation patterns in their semen, and that genes that are more variable at the epigenetic level are also more likely to be variable at the genetic level. DNA sequence variation can affect DNA methylation by modifying CG sites directly, but can also be associated with local variation in cis that is not CG-site specific. We show that covariation in sequence polymorphism and DNA methylation state contributes to the individual-specificity of epigenetic marks in social insects, which likely promotes their retention across generations, and their capacity to influence evolutionary adaptation.

In contrast, the reproductive interests of a mother are generally favoured if her maternal resources are partitioned equally among her present and future offspring. This means that the reproductive interests of mothers and fathers are sometimes in conflict (Burt & Trivers, 2006). Therefore, selection can act divergently on fathers and mothers so that they modify certain genes in their offspring in ways that favour their offspring's reproductive success. Since "imprinting" often implies epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation and histone modification, we will refer to such genes as being "parentally manipulated" to include RNA-mediated manipulations such as RNA interference, that do not include physical changes