Linear ranking functions are often used to transform fuzzy multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problems into crisp ones. The crisp MOLP problems are then solved by using classical methods (eg, weighted sum, epsilon‐constraint, etc), or fuzzy ones based on Bellman and Zadeh's decision‐making model. In this paper, we show that this transformation does not guarantee Pareto optimal fuzzy solutions for the original fuzzy problems. By using lexicographic ranking criteria, we propose a fuzzy epsilon‐constraint method that yields Pareto optimal fuzzy solutions of fuzzy variable and fully fuzzy MOLP problems, in which all parameters and decision variables take on LR fuzzy numbers. The proposed method is illustrated by means of three numerical examples, including a fully fuzzy multiobjective project crashing problem.
The fuzzy linear assignment problem (FLAP) is an extension of the classical linear assignment problem (LAP) to situations in which uncertainty in the cost coefficients is represented by fuzzy numbers. FLAP applications range from the assignment of workers to tasks to multiple-criteria decision analysis in fuzzy environments and many other engineering applications. Most FLAP formulations assume that all cost coefficients are fuzzy numbers of the same type (e.g. triangular, trapezoidal). The standard solution approach is the defuzzification of the cost coefficients, thus transforming the FLAP into a crisp LAP that can be solved by classical assignment algorithms such as the Hungarian method. It is known that defuzzification methods suffer from lack of discrimination when comparing fuzzy numbers which may lead to suboptimal assignments. The solution approach proposed in this paper is based on the theory of algebraic assignment problems and total orderings in the set of all fuzzy numbers, and it allows to solve FLAPs with different types of fuzzy numbers. More specifically, the FLAP is transformed into a lexicographic linear assignment problem (LLAP) which is solved in its place. We show, both theoretically and numerically, how this transformation overcomes the limitations present in existing approaches.
Fuzzy Linear Programming (FLP) has addressed the increasing complexity of real-world decision-making problems that arise in uncertain and ever-changing environments since its introduction in the 1970s. Built upon the Fuzzy Sets theory and classical Linear Programming (LP) theory, FLP encompasses an extensive area of theoretical research and algorithmic development. Unlike classical LP, there is not a unique model for the FLP problem, since fuzziness can appear in the model components in different ways. Hence, despite fifty years of research, new formulations of FLP problems and solution methods are still being proposed. Among the existing formulations, those using fuzzy numbers (FNs) as parameters and/or decision variables for handling inexactness and vagueness in data have experienced a remarkable development in recent years. Here, a long-standing issue has been how to deal with FN-valued objective functions and with constraints whose left- and right-hand sides are FNs. The main objective of this paper is to present an updated review of advances in this particular area. Consequently, the paper briefly examines well-known models and methods for FLP, and expands on methods for fuzzy single- and multi-objective LP that use lexicographic criteria for ranking FNs. A lexicographic approach to the fuzzy linear assignment (FLA) problem is discussed in detail due to the theoretical and practical relevance. For this case, computer codes are provided that can be used to reproduce results presented in the paper and for practical applications. The paper demonstrates that FLP that is focused on lexicographic methods is an active area with promising research lines and practical implications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.