APR-246 (eprenetapopt) is in clinical development with a focus on hematologic malignancies and is promoted as a mutant-p53 reactivation therapy. Currently, the detection of at least one TP53 mutation is an inclusion criterion for patient selection into most APR-246 clinical trials. Preliminary results from our phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating APR-246 combined with doublet chemotherapy [cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] in metastatic esophageal cancer, together with previous preclinical studies, indicate that TP53 mutation status alone may not be a sufficient biomarker for APR-246 response. This study aims to identify a robust biomarker for response to APR-246. Correlation analysis of the PRIMA-1 activity (lead compound to APR-246) with mutational status, gene expression, protein expression, and metabolite abundance across over 700 cancer cell lines (CCL) was performed. Functional validation and a boutique siRNA screen of over 850 redox-related genes were also conducted. TP53 mutation status was not consistently predictive of response to APR-246. The expression of SLC7A11, the cystine/glutamate transporter, was identified as a superior determinant of response to APR-246. Genetic regulators of SLC7A11, including ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53, and c-Myc, were confirmed to also regulate cancer-cell sensitivity to APR-246. In conclusion, SLC7A11 expression is a broadly applicable determinant of sensitivity to APR-246 across cancer and should be utilized as the key predictive biomarker to stratify patients for future clinical investigation of APR-246.

The mechanism of action of eprenetapopt (APR-246, PRIMA-1 MET ) as an anticancer agent remains unresolved, although the clinical development of eprenetapopt focuses on its reported mechanism of action as a mutant-p53 reactivator. Using unbiased approaches, this study demonstrates that eprenetapopt depletes cellular antioxidant glutathione levels by increasing its turnover, triggering a nonapoptotic, iron-dependent form of cell death known as ferroptosis. Deficiency in genes responsible for supplying cancer cells with the substrates for de novo glutathione synthesis ( SLC7A11 , SHMT2 , and MTHFD1L ), as well as the enzymes required to synthesize glutathione ( GCLC and GCLM ), augments the activity of eprenetapopt. Eprenetapopt also inhibits iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis by limiting the cysteine desulfurase activity of NFS1, which potentiates ferroptosis and may restrict cellular proliferation. The combination of eprenetapopt with dietary serine and glycine restriction synergizes to inhibit esophageal xenograft tumor growth. These findings reframe the canonical view of eprenetapopt from a mutant-p53 reactivator to a ferroptosis inducer.

A critical hallmark of cancer cells is their ability to evade programmed apoptotic cell death. Consequently, resistance to anti-cancer therapeutics is a hurdle often observed in the clinic. Ferroptosis, a non-apoptotic form of cell death distinguished by toxic lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation, has garnered substantial attention as an alternative therapeutic strategy to selectively destroy tumours. Although there is a plethora of research outlining the molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis, these findings are yet to be translated into clinical compounds inducing ferroptosis. In this perspective, we elaborate on how ferroptosis can be leveraged in the clinic. We discuss a therapeutic window for compounds inducing ferroptosis, the subset of tumour types that are most sensitive to ferroptosis, conventional therapeutics that induce ferroptosis, and potential strategies for lowering the threshold for ferroptosis.

PurposeAPR-246 (Eprenetapopt) is in clinical development with a focus on haematological malignancies and is marketed as a mutant-p53 reactivation therapy. Currently, the detection of at least one TP53 mutation is an inclusion criterion for patient selection into most clinical trials. Preliminary results from our phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating APR-246 combined with combination chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil) in metastatic oesophageal cancer, together with previous pre-clinical studies, indicate that TP53 mutation status alone may not be a sufficient biomarker for response to APR-246. This study aimed to identify a robust biomarker for response to APR-246.MethodsCorrelation analysis of the PRIMA-1 activity (lead compound to APR-246) with mutational status, gene expression, protein expression and metabolite abundance across over 800 cancer cell lines was performed. Functional validation and a boutique siRNA screen of over 750 redox-related genes were also conducted.ResultsTP53 mutation status was not predictive of response to APR-246. The expression of SLC7A11, the cystine/glutamate transporter, was identified as a superior determinant of response to APR-246. Genetic regulators of SLC7A11, including ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53 and c-Myc were confirmed to also regulate cancer cell sensitivity to APR-246.ConclusionsSLC7A11 expression is the major determinant of sensitivity to APR-246 and should be utilised as a predictive biomarker in future clinical investigation of APR-246.

The prevalence and dire implications of mutations in the tumour suppressor, p53, highlight its appeal as a chemotherapeutic target. We recently showed that impairing cellular antioxidant systems via inhibition of SLC7A11, a component of the system xc− cystine-glutamate antiporter, enhances sensitivity to mutant-p53 targeted therapy, APR-246. We investigated whether this synergy extends to other genes, such as those encoding enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). TKT, one of the major enzymes of the PPP, is allegedly regulated by NRF2, which is in turn impaired by accumulated mutant-p53 protein. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between mutant-p53, TKT and sensitivity to APR-246. We found that mutant-p53 does not alter expression of TKT, nor is TKT modulated directly by NRF2, suggesting a more complex mechanism at play. Furthermore, we found that in p53null cells, knockdown of TKT increased sensitivity to APR-246, whilst TKT overexpression conferred resistance to the drug. However, neither permutation elicited any effect on cells overexpressing mutant-p53 protein, despite mediating oxidative stress levels in a similar fashion to that in p53-null cells. In sum, this study has unveiled TKT expression as a determinant for sensitivity to APR-246 in p53-null cells.

<p>Figure S5 shows MYC directly regulates SLC7A11 levels and APR-246 sensitivity.</p>

<p>Figure S2 shows APR-246 and PX-12 activity correlate in CTRPv2 and their impact on mutant-p53 thermostability.</p>

<p>Figure S2 shows APR-246 and PX-12 activity correlate in CTRPv2 and their impact on mutant-p53 thermostability.</p>